Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 May 2010 08:30:30 GMT, Owen wrote:
If the circuit is not linear in those terms, then you cannot form a valid Thevenin equivalent circuit, and discussion of the Thevenin equivalent series source impedance is a nonsense... it cannot be used. The counter argument, as I understand it, is that the tank circuit isolates the linear from the non-linear, and that the tank also performs the action of transformation. Thus the proposal is an analysis of their combination (I had to struggle to avoid superposition). Thus, the non-linear Tube (because, I presume, the circuit is in Class C operation) exhibits a higher efficiency than would be found in a resistance matched system. What I call the resistance matched system is the unfortunate appeal to a source "resistance" equaling the load "resistance." Thevenin/Norton do not mandate resistors, rather impedances. What I understand, comes from lengthy emails with multiple contributors in years past: Walt and Richard being two of them. My saved mail only goes back nine years, so the other two contributors' names are lost to me right now. Of course what I "understand" may be wholly misrepresented by my exposition here. So be it. The source authorities can correct my deviations. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission Line Reflections | Antenna | |||
Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||
Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||
Reflections on rrap | Antenna | |||
Reflections on rrap | Policy |