Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in
: The time phase angle between E and H is determined by the medium the wave is propagating through. The (complex) ratio of E to H is called the intrinsic impedance of the medium, and for lossless media, it's always a purely real number (about 377 ohms for air or free space), meaning that E and H are in phase. Only when propagating through a lossy medium are E and H not in time phase, and then the maximum phase difference is always less than 45 degrees. If I understand this correctly, a field arrangement with E and H in time and space quadrature is not propagating energy, but rather energy exchange. In very close to an antenna, the time phase relationship of E and H may be close to quadrature due to the inductive or reactive field close to the conductors, but that changes eventually to 'in-phase' in the far radiation field in free space (as the induction field components decay more quickly with distance than the radiation field components). If that is the case, the complex value of E/H varies from very close to the far field. I have seen plots of E/H vs distance that treated E/H as a real number, but I suspect that it is more complex when all of the components of E and H are included. Thoughts? Owen |