Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On May 26, 1:25*am, JIMMIE wrote:
Some of the people I knew who were the most gifted have led the most wasted lives. Can you imagine having an IQ in the 140s and the focus of your life is antennas. What a waste. Kraus, Jasik, and Balanis might disagree - maybe even Terman. Why are antennas a less desirable specialization than any other specialization? Is counting the barbs on a fruit fly's penis to determine its exact species somehow superior to antennas? :-) -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:29:24 -0700, Richard Clark wrote: I'm amazed that anyone even remembers that fictional lake. Bill Baka It's not hard to forget something that is on every week. Well, that logic blew a tire.... I will just ride the rim as I head for the off ramp. 8^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - who to my great embarrassment, was rying to figure that one out for longer than anyone should have. |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
Intelligence is a tool,
Talent is a tool, But they are not the only tools in the box. There is drive, there is curiosity, even OCD or Asperger's can be turned into a tool. There is memory. There is personality. I'm around 150, but all that means is that if a problem interests me, I can figure it our a little before someone who has a lower number. Big deal. Some times I think there is something else too, but I'm too dum to put my finger on it. I've noticed that there is something of a troubleshooting skill that I've got/cultivated that often allows me to diagnose a problem a lot more quickly than most other people. Even that's not much help, because I can often figure out a problem in a minute, then spend the next 20 minutes trying to convince the other people I'm with. That's led to some interesting moments, but point is I think there is some ability to compartmentalize mental functions that isn't directly related to IQ. A fellow who worked for me at one time had a figurative ton of talent. Awesome photographer, highly skilled at tabletop studio photography. Unfortunately, he had no drive, and his work life was a sad cycle of his talent landing him jobs, and his lack of drive losing them for him. I've known people with below average intelligence who had other tools like drive and personality that made them successful, and a joy to work with. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On May 26, 10:43*am, Michael Coslo wrote:
Intelligence is a tool, Talent is a tool, But they are not the only tools in the box. There is drive, there is curiosity, even OCD or Asperger's can be turned into a tool. There is memory. There is personality. I'm around 150, but all that means is that if a problem interests me, I can figure it our a little before someone who has a lower number. Big deal. Some times I think there is something else too, but I'm too dum to put my finger on it. I've noticed that there is something of a troubleshooting skill that I've got/cultivated that often allows me to diagnose a problem a lot more quickly than most other people. Even that's not much help, because I can often figure out a problem in a minute, then spend the next 20 minutes trying to convince the other people I'm with. That's led to some interesting moments, but point is I think there is some ability to compartmentalize mental functions that isn't directly related to IQ. A fellow who worked for me at one time had a figurative ton of talent. Awesome photographer, highly skilled at tabletop studio photography. Unfortunately, he had no drive, and his work life was a sad cycle of his talent landing him jobs, and his lack of drive losing them for him. I've known people with below average intelligence who had other tools like drive and personality that made them successful, and a joy to work with. * * * * - 73 de Mike N3LI - My heårt åttåck probåbly puts me åt the bottom of the heåp. But with åll these high fålluting intelligence numbers how is it thåt åll deny thåt by måking Gåuss låw of ståtic form into dynåmic form Måxwells equåtions åre åpplicåble. We åre tålking båsics clåssicål physics here but we håve nobody who cån explåin why this åproåch is illegål |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On 05/26/2010 08:27 AM, Michael Coslo wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:29:24 -0700, Richard Clark wrote: I'm amazed that anyone even remembers that fictional lake. Bill Baka It's not hard to forget something that is on every week. Well, that logic blew a tire.... I will just ride the rim as I head for the off ramp. 8^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - who to my great embarrassment, was rying to figure that one out for longer than anyone should have. Hey, I do not get his lake woebegone on either TV or radio. I seriously thought he dropped off the radar. Bill Baka |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On 05/26/2010 08:43 AM, Michael Coslo wrote:
Intelligence is a tool, Talent is a tool, But they are not the only tools in the box. There is drive, there is curiosity, even OCD or Asperger's can be turned into a tool. There is memory. There is personality. I'm around 150, but all that means is that if a problem interests me, I can figure it our a little before someone who has a lower number. It is only a number and our individual talents can be very different. I solve a lot of abstract problems and can instantly visualize things that can and should be improved. It really does not matter here. We were really just comparing notes, not bragging. I'm sure some on here could bury me, especially in antenna design. I find that my brain wants a lot of input so I study various things even though I will never work in those fields. I'm 61 so why go back to school?? I am a generalist, not a specialist. Curious about many things, and as you are posting I am still learning about humans reacting to a mere number. I came on here originally to ask if anyone knew about a noise blanker that could be inserted into the receiver/antenna, nothing more. I did expect that most hams are above average, but did not anticipate any hostility. Don't be so touchy, I came here to learn and possibly contribute some of my projects and how they turned out. Big deal. Some times I think there is something else too, but I'm too dum to put my finger on it. I've noticed that there is something of a troubleshooting skill that I've got/cultivated that often allows me to diagnose a problem a lot more quickly than most other people. Even that's not much help, because I can often figure out a problem in a minute, then spend the next 20 minutes trying to convince the other people I'm with. That's led to some interesting moments, but point is I think there is some ability to compartmentalize mental functions that isn't directly related to IQ. That does put you at the very least, above average. A fellow who worked for me at one time had a figurative ton of talent. Awesome photographer, highly skilled at tabletop studio photography. Unfortunately, he had no drive, and his work life was a sad cycle of his talent landing him jobs, and his lack of drive losing them for him. That hasn't happened to me, yet. I've known people with below average intelligence who had other tools like drive and personality that made them successful, and a joy to work with. Same here. Personality makes a huge difference. - 73 de Mike N3LI - Cheers, Bill Baka |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On May 26, 12:01*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
On 05/26/2010 08:43 AM, Michael Coslo wrote: Intelligence is a tool, Talent is a tool, But they are not the only tools in the box. There is drive, there is curiosity, even OCD or Asperger's can be turned into a tool. There is memory. There is personality. I'm around 150, but all that means is that if a problem interests me, I can figure it our a little before someone who has a lower number. It is only a number and our individual talents can be very different. I solve a lot of abstract problems and can instantly visualize things that can and should be improved. It really does not matter here. We were really just comparing notes, not bragging. I'm sure some on here could bury me, especially in antenna design. I find that my brain wants a lot of input so I study various things even though I will never work in those fields. I'm 61 so why go back to school?? I am a generalist, not a specialist. Curious about many things, and as you are posting I am still learning about humans reacting to a mere number. I came on here originally to ask if anyone knew about a noise blanker that could be inserted into the receiver/antenna, nothing more. I did expect that most hams are above average, but did not anticipate any hostility. Don't be so touchy, I came here to learn and possibly contribute some of my projects and how they turned out. Big deal. Some times I think there is something else too, but I'm too dum to put my finger on it. I've noticed that there is something of a troubleshooting skill that I've got/cultivated that often allows me to diagnose a problem a lot more quickly than most other people. Even that's not much help, because I can often figure out a problem in a minute, then spend the next 20 minutes trying to convince the other people I'm with. That's led to some interesting moments, but point is I think there is some ability to compartmentalize mental functions that isn't directly related to IQ. That does put you at the very least, above average. A fellow who worked for me at one time had a figurative ton of talent. Awesome photographer, highly skilled at tabletop studio photography. Unfortunately, he had no drive, and his work life was a sad cycle of his talent landing him jobs, and his lack of drive losing them for him. That hasn't happened to me, yet. I've known people with below average intelligence who had other tools like drive and personality that made them successful, and a joy to work with. Same here. Personality makes a huge difference. - 73 de Mike N3LI - Cheers, Bill Baka The hostility towårds me is becåuse I åm seårching for å wåy to better describe propågåtion. I stumbled on the ideå of måking å Gåussiån ståtic boundåry dynåmic such thåt Måxwells låws were åpplicåble. This immediåtely showed thåt pårticles ånd not wåves were the cårriers of propågåtion. We åre å very old group thåt hås lived long on the ideå thåt wåves were the cårriers of propågåtion so åll åre fighting like hell ågåinst chånge. So åll håve cåme up with the ideå thåt it is illegål to trånsform å ståtic field into å dynåmic field becåuse nowhere is it ståted in print thåt thus wås å låwfull åproåch. N obody thru the yeårs håve come up with å reåson why this line of thought is illegål ånd in leåu of this håve substituted hostility. It is to the benefit of åll thåt ån explånåtion of the illegållity is provided ånd yet åll åre silent with respect to supplying å reåson ånd thus håve reverted to hostility. I thought yeårs ågo thåt becåuse the group were supposed to be experts ån explånåtion would be provided. Sådley it would åppeår thåt the older we get the more resistånt we åre to chånge ånd thus it tåkes the provision of å new generåtion before ådvånces åre åccepted Årt Unwinåntennåss |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On May 26, 6:00*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On May 26, 12:01*pm, Bill Baka wrote: On 05/26/2010 08:43 AM, Michael Coslo wrote: Intelligence is a tool, Talent is a tool, But they are not the only tools in the box. There is drive, there is curiosity, even OCD or Asperger's can be turned into a tool. There is memory. There is personality. I'm around 150, but all that means is that if a problem interests me, I can figure it our a little before someone who has a lower number. It is only a number and our individual talents can be very different. I solve a lot of abstract problems and can instantly visualize things that can and should be improved. It really does not matter here. We were really just comparing notes, not bragging. I'm sure some on here could bury me, especially in antenna design. I find that my brain wants a lot of input so I study various things even though I will never work in those fields. I'm 61 so why go back to school?? I am a generalist, not a specialist. Curious about many things, and as you are posting I am still learning about humans reacting to a mere number. I came on here originally to ask if anyone knew about a noise blanker that could be inserted into the receiver/antenna, nothing more. I did expect that most hams are above average, but did not anticipate any hostility. Don't be so touchy, I came here to learn and possibly contribute some of my projects and how they turned out. Big deal. Some times I think there is something else too, but I'm too dum to put my finger on it. I've noticed that there is something of a troubleshooting skill that I've got/cultivated that often allows me to diagnose a problem a lot more quickly than most other people. Even that's not much help, because I can often figure out a problem in a minute, then spend the next 20 minutes trying to convince the other people I'm with. That's led to some interesting moments, but point is I think there is some ability to compartmentalize mental functions that isn't directly related to IQ. That does put you at the very least, above average. A fellow who worked for me at one time had a figurative ton of talent.. Awesome photographer, highly skilled at tabletop studio photography. Unfortunately, he had no drive, and his work life was a sad cycle of his talent landing him jobs, and his lack of drive losing them for him. That hasn't happened to me, yet. I've known people with below average intelligence who had other tools like drive and personality that made them successful, and a joy to work with. Same here. Personality makes a huge difference. - 73 de Mike N3LI - Cheers, Bill Baka The hostility towårds me is becåuse I åm seårching for å wåy to better describe propågåtion. I stumbled on the ideå of måking å Gåussiån ståtic boundåry dynåmic such thåt Måxwells låws were åpplicåble. This immediåtely showed thåt pårticles ånd not wåves were the cårriers of propågåtion. We åre å very old group thåt hås lived long on the ideå thåt wåves were the cårriers of propågåtion so åll åre fighting like hell ågåinst chånge. So åll håve cåme up with the ideå thåt it is illegål to trånsform å ståtic field into å dynåmic field becåuse nowhere is it ståted in print thåt thus wås å låwfull åproåch. N obody thru the yeårs håve come up with å reåson why this line of thought is illegål ånd in leåu of this håve substituted hostility.. It is to the benefit of åll thåt ån explånåtion of the illegållity is provided ånd yet åll åre silent with respect to supplying å reåson ånd thus håve reverted to hostility. I thought yeårs ågo thåt becåuse the group were supposed to be experts ån explånåtion would be provided. Sådley it would åppeår thåt the older we get the more resistånt we åre to chånge ånd thus it tåkes the provision of å new generåtion before ådvånces åre åccepted Årt Unwinåntennåss unfortunately bill, art suffers from short memory also among his other debilities. it has been explained to him several times by different people that gauss'es law is perfectly applicable to both static and varying fields without his 'improvement', he just can't remember it from day to day. |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On 5/26/2010 9:32 AM, Cecil Moore wrote:
On May 26, 1:25 am, wrote: Some of the people I knew who were the most gifted have led the most wasted lives. Can you imagine having an IQ in the 140s and the focus of your life is antennas. What a waste. Kraus, Jasik, and Balanis might disagree - maybe even Terman. Why are antennas a less desirable specialization than any other specialization? Is counting the barbs on a fruit fly's penis to determine its exact species somehow superior to antennas? :-) -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com I don't know Cecil, he may be correct. Who needs TV, radio, cell phones, satellites, WiFi and other crap like that? tom K0TAR |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Computer model experiment
On May 26, 6:14*pm, K1TTT wrote:
On May 26, 6:00*pm, Art Unwin wrote: On May 26, 12:01*pm, Bill Baka wrote: On 05/26/2010 08:43 AM, Michael Coslo wrote: Intelligence is a tool, Talent is a tool, But they are not the only tools in the box. There is drive, there is curiosity, even OCD or Asperger's can be turned into a tool. There is memory. There is personality. I'm around 150, but all that means is that if a problem interests me, I can figure it our a little before someone who has a lower number. It is only a number and our individual talents can be very different. I solve a lot of abstract problems and can instantly visualize things that can and should be improved. It really does not matter here. We were really just comparing notes, not bragging. I'm sure some on here could bury me, especially in antenna design. I find that my brain wants a lot of input so I study various things even though I will never work in those fields. I'm 61 so why go back to school?? I am a generalist, not a specialist. Curious about many things, and as you are posting I am still learning about humans reacting to a mere number. I came on here originally to ask if anyone knew about a noise blanker that could be inserted into the receiver/antenna, nothing more. I did expect that most hams are above average, but did not anticipate any hostility. Don't be so touchy, I came here to learn and possibly contribute some of my projects and how they turned out. Big deal. Some times I think there is something else too, but I'm too dum to put my finger on it. I've noticed that there is something of a troubleshooting skill that I've got/cultivated that often allows me to diagnose a problem a lot more quickly than most other people. Even that's not much help, because I can often figure out a problem in a minute, then spend the next 20 minutes trying to convince the other people I'm with. That's led to some interesting moments, but point is I think there is some ability to compartmentalize mental functions that isn't directly related to IQ. That does put you at the very least, above average. A fellow who worked for me at one time had a figurative ton of talent. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment |