| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 10, 9:34*pm, "Ralph Mowery" wrote:
"tom" wrote in message t... On 5/10/2010 3:12 PM, wrote: As Clint said in the wonderful old movie, "A man's gotta know his limits". For antenna modelers it should read, "A man's gotta know the program's limits". Of course, Art thinks things have changed and the computer modelers have a better grasp upon reality than the ones even he calls "the masters". He is an example of the blind man leading himself. tom K0TAR The computer program should know its limits. *Anytine a program allows the data entered to be too large or small for the calculations, it should be flagged as being out of range. *Also many computer programs will use simplified formulars that can mast the true outcome. *Usually it is not very much, but as all errors start to add up the end results may be way off. I often enter data that I know will be difficult for programs to use. *If the program gives an answer then I usually don't use that program expecting a exect answer. Back in the Windows 3.1 and 3.11 days the simple calculator would give wrong answers to simple problems. *I think if you entered 3.11 and subtracted 3.1 from it you got the wrong answer. *That program was not corrected by Microsoft. Ralph, the computer program I use is AO pro which is equipt with an optimiser and based on Maxwells equation. It is required to provide arrays where the whole is in equilibrium as is its parts where all forces are taken into account according to boundary rules. It is quite easy to confirm if the results are in equilibrium.There are many programs that arer similar only they will not crunch the numbers as an optimiser will but instead calculate only from your input but without alteration. These also are based on Maxwells equations. However hams are bound to Yagi style antenna designs which are planar and not in equilibrium. This style of program is modified to encompass its primary use. There are also programs that are specifically designed for planar arrangement only per the Yagi and are not based solely on Maxwell equations that demand equilibrium. To apply any of these programs is ok for a dipole in free space say for 14 Mhz and should give the same results. Same goes if one changes the diameter as will the radiation pattern provided. So in this particular situation it matters not what program one uses the results will be the same. To conform with Maxwells equation equilibrium is demanded ie all vectors add up to zero.Since it is based on boundary rules one can make a static field dynamic which thus includes particles where the result is applicable to Maxwells equations. Thus we have an conductive element covered or encapsulated by particles the later being dynamic.This produces two resistances, the element and the particle skin. The element resistance goes to zero as the current flow moves towards the surface thus removing skin penetration losses and where all energy input is applied to propagation where we get accountability for all forces resulting in an array or element where all is in equilibrium without being planar as one must account for the earths rotation vector as well as that for gravity otherwise equilibrium cannot be retained. Thus as the diameter of the element is increased so does the surface increase for the resting particles such that the applied energy equals the energy required to elevate and propagate the supplied particles. without penetrating the surface of the element. This way we do not get into the situation of dealing with the sharing of the total resistance and thus removing element losses that do nothing for propagation, at the same time balancing the propagation vectors upon the particles alone to the applied energy. All basic classical physics which uses only fully accepted rules of the masters without alteration of any kind as predicted by Einstein in his search for the std model. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment | |||