On 5/10/2010 10:21 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
Ralph, the computer program I use is AO pro which is equipt with an
optimiser and based on Maxwells equation. It is required to provide

Art

I was an alpha tester on AO. Do you know what an alpha tester is?

I am sure that I know much more about this program's capabilities and
especially its limitations than you.

And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're
making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate.

tom
K0TAR

On May 10, 10:40*pm, tom wrote:
And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're
making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate.

Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees.

http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

On May 11, 7:35*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
On May 10, 10:40*pm, tom wrote:

And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're
making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate.

Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees.

http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Shall I help you file the patent? Maybe we can split the sales
50/50 ? Chortle.. We will be rich beyond our wildest dreams.
Go down in history as two of the "masters"... :/
I'll be able to finally afford the GI Joe with the Kung Fu grip after
all
these years. After all, that's what really matters.

On 5/11/2010 7:35 AM, Cecil Moore wrote:
On May 10, 10:40 pm, wrote:
And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're
making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate.

Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees.

http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com


I don't know what the problem is, Cecil, it looks perfectly normal to
me. And it's great, effectively an omnidirectional super yagi on 40m
kind of thing.

You patented it, right?

tom
K0TAR

On May 11, 9:23*pm, tom wrote:
I don't know what the problem is, Cecil, it looks perfectly normal to
me.

Yep, one of its claims to fame is that it passes all the geometry and
segmentation checks that EZNEC runs. However, it does violate the
"spacing of elements" admonition in the manual.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

As given, the average gain is about 16.7 dB - so one knows that
something-is-afoot . . .
The driven element (wire 1) is essentially touching wire 4. Current in wire
4 is unbelievably high. With use of #30 wire things improve, but wires are
too close.

Thanks for the example. Will use it when next talking about NEC as an
example of what not to do.

73, Mac N8TT
--
J. McLaughlin; Michigan, USA
Home:

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
snip

Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees.

http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

On May 11, 4:40*am, tom wrote:


Art

I was an alpha tester on AO. *Do you know what an alpha tester is?

I am sure that I know much more about this program's capabilities and
especially its limitations than you.

And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're
making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate.

tom
K0TAR
..
How many threads here and elsewhere are dedicated to demonstrating to
Art Unwin that he is wrong. The number must be in the hundreds. What a
waste.
Does anyone benefit? Art will go to his grave convinced that the world
is in error.
Usenet allows one person to irritate hundreds (at least) of people at
one time, on a regular basis. A borderline personality for sure.

On 5/10/2010 10:40 PM, tom wrote:
On 5/10/2010 10:21 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
Ralph, the computer program I use is AO pro which is equipt with an
optimiser and based on Maxwells equation. It is required to provide

Art

I was an alpha tester on AO. Do you know what an alpha tester is?

I am sure that I know much more about this program's capabilities and
especially its limitations than you.

And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're
making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate.

tom
K0TAR

Art?

No comment?

tom
K0TAR