Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/10/2010 10:21 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
Ralph, the computer program I use is AO pro which is equipt with an optimiser and based on Maxwells equation. It is required to provide Art I was an alpha tester on AO. Do you know what an alpha tester is? I am sure that I know much more about this program's capabilities and especially its limitations than you. And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate. tom K0TAR |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 10, 10:40*pm, tom wrote:
And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate. Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees. http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 11, 7:35*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
On May 10, 10:40*pm, tom wrote: And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate. Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees. http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com Shall I help you file the patent? Maybe we can split the sales 50/50 ? Chortle.. We will be rich beyond our wildest dreams. Go down in history as two of the "masters"... :/ I'll be able to finally afford the GI Joe with the Kung Fu grip after all these years. ![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/11/2010 7:35 AM, Cecil Moore wrote:
On May 10, 10:40 pm, wrote: And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate. Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees. http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com I don't know what the problem is, Cecil, it looks perfectly normal to me. And it's great, effectively an omnidirectional super yagi on 40m kind of thing. You patented it, right? tom K0TAR |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 11, 9:23*pm, tom wrote:
I don't know what the problem is, Cecil, it looks perfectly normal to me. Yep, one of its claims to fame is that it passes all the geometry and segmentation checks that EZNEC runs. However, it does violate the "spacing of elements" admonition in the manual. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As given, the average gain is about 16.7 dB - so one knows that
something-is-afoot . . . The driven element (wire 1) is essentially touching wire 4. Current in wire 4 is unbelievably high. With use of #30 wire things improve, but wires are too close. Thanks for the example. Will use it when next talking about NEC as an example of what not to do. 73, Mac N8TT -- J. McLaughlin; Michigan, USA Home: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... snip Here's my super-gain antenna with 24 dBi gain at a TOA of 23 degrees. http://www.w5dxp.com/SUPRGAIN.EZ -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 11, 4:40*am, tom wrote:
Art I was an alpha tester on AO. *Do you know what an alpha tester is? I am sure that I know much more about this program's capabilities and especially its limitations than you. And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate. tom K0TAR .. How many threads here and elsewhere are dedicated to demonstrating to Art Unwin that he is wrong. The number must be in the hundreds. What a waste. Does anyone benefit? Art will go to his grave convinced that the world is in error. Usenet allows one person to irritate hundreds (at least) of people at one time, on a regular basis. A borderline personality for sure. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/10/2010 10:40 PM, tom wrote:
On 5/10/2010 10:21 PM, Art Unwin wrote: Ralph, the computer program I use is AO pro which is equipt with an optimiser and based on Maxwells equation. It is required to provide Art I was an alpha tester on AO. Do you know what an alpha tester is? I am sure that I know much more about this program's capabilities and especially its limitations than you. And almost everything you claim about it, now that I know what you're making claims against, is either wrong or inaccurate. tom K0TAR Art? No comment? tom K0TAR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment |