Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 12, 3:49*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
Again I state. *If you are using Maxwell *equations you cannot stray from the units supplied.Hams do not follow the rules with respect to antennas so approximations are literally garranteed. Maybe this is good.. I have noticed my antennas tend to actually work as radiators of RF, where as most of yours seem to prefer to turn it to heat. :/ I think Maxwell must be taking you for a big ride. I bet he's up there is the land of the big RF just laughing his head off at all this silly jibber jabber you keep blaming him for. Using Maxwells equations alone you have the presence of point radiation. With a single point radiation the rules of physics state that radiation limits is in the form of a sphere. If one states you cannot have a sphere of radiation they are breaking all the laws of physics and I certainly had no part in the making of the rules. Regards Art How many cases of a single point of radiation have you seen in the real world, using real world antennas? This is not a trick question. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment |