Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 May 2010 22:06:49 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote: Little might have changed since, except that the fluorescence of newsgroup gurus have enlightened modern civilization with advances in accuracies now verging on ±6dB where the pre-eminence of water has been overthrown in favor of photon-stream control. The binary search that was formerly the cornerstone of modeling has been replaced with the unary declaration that is self-proven by having been uttered (or posted to a group that has a vague resemblance to the topic). Hence, the inaccuracies of coins has been wholly removed to yield perfect understanding (within ±6dB, of course). That's a fair description of the digital part of antenna design, but prior to the invention of computing, all such antennas were analog in nature. The ancient pagans, that found the ideal size and shape of trees necessary to obtain the attention of the gods were using analog cut-n-try techniques. Given sufficient time and trees, the design was eventually optimized. Somewhat later, the Romans and Greeks discovered that the E and H directions, the ratio of which was defined by the golden section. Again, this was not a digital model, but determined with analog techniques. Once the ratios were accurately determined, the resultant telephone pole like structure could be used for everything from art to executions. One of the reasons the Roman Empire lasted so long is that they didn't have a symbol for zero, thus avoiding the divide by zero problem. In any case, the design was demonstratively functions, as installing the design on a hill top, would invariably draw lightning. After about a millennium, people started running out of hilltops and tall trees, and found it more convenient to produce their own lightning. The previously functional structures were wrapped in metallic wires and waved around a magnet, thus resulting in home made lightning. Calculations were again attempted, but since the zero had been invented, none of the math would work. Once again, civilization rested on the tried and true analog method of cut-n-try. Modern antenna design followed the same analog patterns. With the aid of the analog slide rule, accuracy could be improved to about 2 significant figures. That worked fine until the invention of the digital computer. Suddenly, 2 sig fig was not enough. The digital computer could calculate to amazing levels of precision and suddenly everything had to conform to this standard. Instead of "cut to fit" and "tweak and tune" it was now necessary to justify the cost of the new digital computers with absurd accuracies. Good enough lasted only until the next model computer. So, here we are, debating the relative merits of the umpteenth decimal place, splitting hairs multiple times, and digitally modeling to quantum levels. While useful for justifying the computers, the resultant antennas look roughly the same as the old cut-n-try models designed with an analog slide rule. Whatever your vision of modeling history, one historical observation remains constant. One must always suffer before enlightenment and this newsgroup provides that function. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment |