| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 14 May 2010 21:07:32 -0500, tom wrote:
Don't think that seemingly large chunks mean poor accuracy. When the algorithm is good, and the program selects the chunk size well, the results can be very close to the true answer. I recall Simpson's Rule from work about 23 years ago that lead me to finding more accurate methods in a great compendium of "Numerical Recipes The Art of Scientific Computing." Press, Flannery, Teukolsky, Vetterling, Cambridge University Press, 1986 which has Simpon's 3/8th Rule, and a more extensive "Bode's rule... This is exact for polynomials up to and including degree 5. "At this point the formulas stop being named after famous personages, so we will not go any further. Consult Abramowitz and Stegun for aditional formulas in the sequence." The book continues with FORTRAN (my first language) and Pascal (my 9th or 11th language or dialect by that time) interpretations of a spectrum of math systems for another 700 pages.... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer Tube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Philbrick GAP/R Model K2-W Early Computer VacuumTube Op-Amp | Boatanchors | |||
| FA: Radio Shack Model 100 laptop computer ++ | Equipment | |||