On May 20, 10:54*pm, "Irv Finkleman" wrote:
O Jeez! Here we go again!!!! All this about vortices sounds like spin to me.

Irv VE6BP

Exactly. Imagine a tornado which is a macro scale version of the
vortice seen as a displacement current
as a series of capacitors along side the current flow
within which there is circular flow. This is no different
to the laminar flow in a firemans hose. Put projections inside the
hose and you can get multiple vortices because of the lamina
friction.You probably have heard of "curl" with respect to antennas
and yes that is described with respect to vortices. So it is not so
far out to see a tornado
as a cloud enclosed by neutrons in terms of a skin tension. This all
goes back to the release of a small particle from the boundary
enclosing the big band
where rotation is applied to same via the levered fracture in the
boundary as it momentarily loses equilibrium. For the above tornadoes
are seen as the swirling action between capacitor plates comprised of
ground and the upper layers. The capacitor plates perform the same
action as a "idler" wheel so that ejected rotations of particles have
the same spin.
Review vortices if only to get a physical idea how the term "curl"
fits in with respect to lamina flow which you can then expand to
magnetic lines or field of a magnet for a better understanding of
transitions. Everything on Earth can be described by the two vectors
created at the big bang down to the two vectors of gravity and
rotation where rotary flow introduces lamina slip and the adherence to
Newtons laws including his equations for acceleration. All the above
is thoroughly seen under boundary laws which are centuries old, when
static fields are transformed into a dynamic field. Nothing new, no
new laws or equations but just a different method of connecting the
known dots determined by past physics to produce a closed circuit
similar to the tank circuit in parallel
Art