| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
May 13th 10, 10:50 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Feeding System found it = Mosley
I think: If your assumed numbers were those of the Mosley beam, its
SWR would be 4:1(without losses), and with losses included she would be ˇa very nasty antenna!. I think the ham buyers would not be very happy with such a poor antenna on both cases :) I am not saying that the Mosley antenna has a bad SWR or that is has a low gain. I am just saying that the explanation they give for their matching arrangement is not convincing. And this leads me to believe that their matching arrangement is not equivalent to a simple capacitor in series... 73 Tony I0JX |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Feeding system name? | Antenna | |||
| Wanted Mosley WARC Kit for Mosley CL-33-M Beam | Boatanchors | |||
| Mosley NOS, TA-53M | Homebrew | |||
| old trunking system information MISC system info | Scanner | |||
| Mosley TA-33 | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
