Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just modeled two coils counter wound and one inside the other as a
complete closed circuit , end fed. Counter winding is quite the norm with special purpose machinery to prevent inter tangling of coils when compressed. With the coils wound opposite to each other it made quite a nice antenna when placed on a flat plate. Beam was pencil shaped without side lobes and sensitive to all polarities.Thus any such dishes could be used for 'point to point' using any type circular polarization. Smaller in size compared to other designs is rather obvious. Where Kraus determined such an antenna single wound form demanded a certain angular pitch such a requirement is not apparent with this design. Kraus assumed a certain pitch was required when wave composition clashed, but the opposite happens when particles vectors add. Another example of particle versus waves disputes.It also confirms Maxwells equation by removing the effect of lumped loads which was not included in his equation as was not the stipulation that a radiator must be straight. Caution: Above details not yet "printed" in a book so it must be considered questionable. Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
Icom AH-4 mobile users: radiating element? | Antenna | |||
Icom AH-4 mobile users: radiating element? | Equipment | |||
Non-radiating Feedlines? | Antenna | |||
Physical size of radiating element? | Antenna |