| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"-.-. --.-" ha scritto nel messaggio ... Hello, my mobile setup is composed by a 2 meter vertical whip feeded immediately close to it by an automatic antenna tuner. Thanks to all. Now is a clear statement that my problem is measuring the "inefficiency" of the entire system ![]() Only to mention that due to a sort of "quiet life way" with the neighbors, my home setup is a ATU CG-3000 feeding 9,5 meters height monopole with about 40 random lenght radials (from 5 to 20 meters of lenght) and electrically connectet to 200 square meters of chicken fence, with real chickens inside perform quite well on 80, from 40 to 12 meters is probably the best antenna i ever had compared to old dipoles, in 10 maybe it is too close to 1 WL... but work almost all , even in furiouses pile ups. Now that I annoyed with this info, the conclusion of the OP or the third question if you want: how it is possible that mobile setups with the "motorized" antennas can have a minimum of efficiency in 40 meters ?? What the difference from a variabile motoryzed L and an ATU at the feed point ?? Or i miss something important about the 2 feeding methods ?? TIA, -.-. --.- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 10m - 40m non resonant vertical | Antenna | |||
| Got my vertical resonant on 160 | Shortwave | |||
| Resonant radials | Antenna | |||
| Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
| RESONANT ANTENNAS | Antenna | |||