Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 1:23*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
In the admittedly very few looks I've had at mobile "shootout" results, there seems to be more of a correlation between vehicle size and field strength than antenna and field strength. This comes as no surprise, since the vehicle is usually a comparable or even greater part of the radiating system than the titular antenna, and its coupling to ground has a large impact on the efficiency. Which is why, in this case, it is well to note that the 0 dB top-rated antenna and the -12 dB antenna were mounted on the same vehicle (mine). -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
10m - 40m non resonant vertical | Antenna | |||
Got my vertical resonant on 160 | Shortwave | |||
Resonant radials | Antenna | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
RESONANT ANTENNAS | Antenna |