Home Menu

Menu


RadioBanter » rec.radio.amateur » Antenna > what happens to reflected energy ?
Reply
Page 32 of 32 « First 2225262728293031 32
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #311   Report Post  
Old July 9th 10, 06:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 484
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #312   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 02:13 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2010
Posts: 92
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.


Please God, let this thread die!
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #313   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 04:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 143
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On 9 jul, 22:13, Allodoxaphobia
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!- Ocultar texto de la cita -

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

You have been forced to read it? Call the police ! (911)
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #314   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 04:43 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On 7/9/2010 8:13 PM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16 pm, "Szczepan wrote:
...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan wrote:



They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.


Please God, let this thread die!

If it causes you pain I'd suggest filtering this thread out.

If you don't know how to do it I'm sure someone here would help you.
They are incredibly helpful. When they agree on something.

tom
K0TAR
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #315   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 11:28 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 484
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 10, 1:13*am, Allodoxaphobia
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!

NEVER!
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #316   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 11:28 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 484
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On Jul 10, 3:43*am, tom wrote:
On 7/9/2010 8:13 PM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:



On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16 pm, "Szczepan *wrote:
* ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan *wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!

If it causes you pain I'd suggest filtering this thread out.

If you don't know how to do it I'm sure someone here would help you.
They are incredibly helpful. *When they agree on something.

tom
K0TAR

but when has that ever happened?
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #317   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 03:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default what happens to reflected energy ?
On 7/10/2010 5:28 AM, K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 10, 3:43 am, wrote:
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!

If it causes you pain I'd suggest filtering this thread out.

If you don't know how to do it I'm sure someone here would help you.
They are incredibly helpful. When they agree on something.

tom
K0TAR

but when has that ever happened?

Exactly.

tom
K0TAR
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #318   Report Post  
Old July 10th 10, 05:51 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 707
Default what happens to reflected energy ?

"K1TTT" wrote
...

Please God, let this thread die!

NEVER!

I know. You appreciate my free lectures.

Now is time for the solitons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

Real waves are not simetrical. They are the chain of solitons. Radio waves
also.
S*


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply
Page 32 of 32 « First 2225262728293031 32
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reflected Energy Cecil Moore Antenna 12 November 19th 04 09:01 PM
Reflected power ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 328 June 9th 04 01:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Contact Us RadioBanter forum home Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017