Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 8:55*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:01:20 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote: as in the other thread, what is the mechanism of that 'interaction' between waves? *i contend there can be no 'interaction' between forward and reflected waves if the device is linear. *so in an ideal case of a voltage or current source and ideal source resistance there is no interaction, it is reflected by and/or absorbed in the source depending on the impedance of the line and source. * There is no mixing as in multiplication of waveforms. *Perhaps I can offer a simple analogy. *Instead of two AC waveforms (forward and reflected), use a DC equivalent. *Start with two DIFFERENT batteries. Connect the two negative ends together and declare that to be ground. Connect a resistor between the positive terminals. *The two voltages most certainly "interact" across the resistor, resulting in the current and power being proportional to the difference between the two battery voltages. *Nothing in this crude example is non-linear, so there's no need for mixing in order to get interaction. it is very misleading to try to make a lumped circuit analogy out of a transmission line problem. the first step in any circuits 101 course would be to simplify the two batteries into one then solve for the single simple current across the resistor... no waves, no back and forth, no interaction between batteries, just a single current and voltage. Similarly, the coax cable acts much in the same way. *The two batteries are replaced by the incident and reflected signals. *At any time, or position on the transmission line, the model can be frozen and the instantaneous voltages and currents be calculated. * they can be, but what does it prove? i want to freeze it just as the first wave gets to the load, there is no reflected wave yet, so what good is that? in order to use our common equations there are many unstated but necessary assumptions. the most restrictive of which is that we normally only solve for the sinusoidal steady state waves... this requires that a long time(in terms of the length of the line) has passed since the source was energized, that it is a single frequency pure sine wave, and that nothing is changing in time in the load or line characteristics. given all that there is no need for instantaneous values, sure they can be calculated or measured, but they are of no use in most cases. if the source is not linear then you would have to calculate the effect of the sum of the voltages or currents at the source to determine the effect. If the source (or load) is non-linear, then the waveforms seen on the transmission line will be distorted. *This is unlikely because we usually don't install diodes in antennas, or build HF amplifiers with substantial non-linearities (i.e. distortion). and obviously if either one is non-linear then all the simple equations can be abandoned and a more complete analysis must be done. -- Jeff Liebermann * * 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? | Antenna |