Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 jun, 19:00, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:42:31 -0700 (PDT), Wimpie wrote: However a PA is not a 50 Ohms source Hi Wimpie, You say this like others, with the air of "knowing." *However, when I ask in response of those who "know" what the PA is NOT, what IS it? Give me the Z value of your transmitter. *Specify all initial conditions. We have had lengthy correspondence with Walt Maxwell's very rigorously measured Kenwood TS830s that demonstrates a Z of 50 Ohms, or nearly that as is practicable (say +/- 20%); and yet your voice was missing from this discussion with evidence to the contrary. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hello Richard, Try the following experiment: Measure the forward power of your PA at a convenient load. Use a directional coupler for that, not a voltage meter calibrated for power. The "SET" or "CAL" position of a VSWR meter can be used as forward power indicator. Now make some mismatch (for example VSWR=2 at different phase) and read the forward power. Did it change? If so, the output impedance is no (longer) 50 Ohms. If possible, disable automatic protection to avoid changing drive level. I don't know the value for my FT7B, but I know forward power changes with load variations (as I use it as "measuring instrument" sometimes). Virtually all power amplifiers I designed do not have a large signal output impedance of 50 ohms under significant load change. For some I measured it because of a discussion on this between colleges. Measuring method used: change in resistive load, from voltage change you can calculate the current change, hence the output impedance. One note, except two, all where solid state. All high efficiency designs (class E, D) that I did have output impedance far from the expected load impedance. With "far" I mean factor 2 or factor 0.5. I did not measure that (as it is not important in virtually all cases), but know it from the overload simulation/measurement and I did the design myself. The reason for not being 50 Ohms (after matching) is that when you change the load, the active device will go into voltage or current saturation. This is not a hard process, so for small load variation (low VSWR values), forward power will not change much. I think this is especially true for vacuum triode PA where you have significant tube- internal feedback. For large variation (for example VSWR = 2.5, reflected power 18%), you will notice change in forward power for most power amplifiers. High efficiency CW amplifiers use saturated switches (for example half, full bridge or push-pull), so behave (seen at the active device) as a voltage source. Depending on the total phase shift of the filter sections this may convert to a current source behavior (seen at the output). I had to spent much time to avoid destruction of some circuits in case of mismatch. If you can drop me a link to the discussion of the TS830s, I would appreciate that. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl Remove abc first in case of PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? | Antenna |