Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 9:34*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT), Keith Dysart wrote: The 100W forward and 50W reflected have no relation to actual powers From HP Journal V4n5-6: The multi-hole coupler design has now been extended to a 3 db coupler, that is, a coupler in which half the power entering the main guide is coupled into the auxiliary guide. ... The -hp- multi-hole couplers consist of two sections of wave guide mutually coupled by two rows of coupling holes (Fig. 2). Power entering the input arm of the coupler flows down the main guide and divides at the coupling mechanism. Part of the power con tinues down the main guide where it will be incident on any device connected at the end of the guide. The other part of the power is coupled into the auxiliary guide. It is a prop erty of directional couplers that the power coupled into the auxiliary guide flows essen tially in only one direction. In the -hp- coup ler, this power flow is in the same direction as the power in the primary guide. ... R E F L E C T O M E T E R * S E T - U P ... Two directional couplers are connected back-to-back as shown. ******* I will leave it to the readership to imagine why. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Walter was the first to place things in a book and a book is the first point of reference in this newsgroup Nothing personal Richard, but it is obvious that engineers are totally split as to what theorem is correct and the one to be used. There is no way you will get agreement if they all insist their position is correct and thus other positions are not worth consideration.You may be correct in your position but the idea of change is not in your favor. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? | Antenna |