Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 30, 10:03*pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
lu6etj wrote: On 29 jun, 15:08, Cecil Moore wrote: On Jun 29, 12:54 pm, Jim Lux wrote: photons can flow through a dielectric.. isn't that what EM propagation is, after all? Yes, after I posted it, I realized that it was a rhetorical question. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com I learnt displacement current inside a condenser it was = eo* d(phi E)/ dt no EM radiation inside the condenser to made that current possible, in any case EM radiation in physical condenser will come out from condenser to the rest of the universe :). I also learnt photons was necessary to explain certain energy interchange phenomena such as fotoelectric effect or subatomic particle interactions, wave-particle duality for me means "duality", not "wave kaput" :) to account for EM wave well explainable phenomenom. As it was taught to me (I am not physicist), quantum nature of a 80 m wavelenght energy it is useless for calculations and invisible to our instrument resolution because its immensely large quantic number. Is it wrong? Miguel LU6ETJ Photons are very useful in the analysis of transmission lines. They can be brought into the discussion to divert it from taking a path that makes a participant uncomfortable. If unable to answer a question logically, simply toss photons, optics, quantum mechanics, aether, and other confounding factors in, and presto, people will begin arguing about the spurious concepts and forget that you've avoided answering the difficult question. It's called misdirection, a time-honored technique used by politicians and prestidigitators as well as promoters of pseudoscience. Roy Lewallen, W7EL yeah, ain't it great fun! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? | Antenna |