On 4 jul, 20:53, K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 4, 4:19*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:





"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 4, 8:28 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

"lu6etj"
...

Hi hi, Why I find it more hard to translate your writings than another

guys ones? is it a peculiarity of your playing with words or your zone
manners? I am sorry because I miss some of your subtleties or
grammatical tricks and I suspect they have more funny meanings that I
can capture :)

Try to understand. Richard gives the free English lessons. I have learnt
a
lot from him.
S*
just nothing about electromagnetics i guess.

Yes. Because I am interested in the antennas and Richard is an expert in it.
*In electromagnetics Maxwell and Heaveside are the experts. Available on
line.
S*

unfortunately you have to learn modern em to know what writings of
maxwell and heaveside to bother believing... they both went through
learning periods before they came to the final transverse wave
formulations. *if you read their earlier works you will be mislead
because they were still learning and following dead end paths like
aether theory and fluid analogies.- Ocultar texto de la cita -

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

Hello all, friends.

Sorry, I thought we was basically alone in this issue with Richard :)

Then, perhaps some of you can help me if I am not capable to make my
poor english writings intelligible enough. I feel as if Richard had
not pointed in the direction I point. I think that because his
references to S+N/N and others made me think Richard are thinking in
detect low frequency wave quanta at little energy levels, and I am
talking about to perceive the little LF quanta at high energy levels
(large scale oscillators).
In my original example I said we are not able distinguish (today...
tomorrow who knows?) Osc. A from Osc. B, having Osc. A 4*10^28
quanta and Osc. B 4*10^28 +1 quanta, having each 80 m quantum 2.3 *
10^-19 J.

(I know my friend Richard inevitably is going to penalize me for this
"analogy", but it is so beautiful that I could not resist..!) = The
problem is such as distinguish between two zeppelins of about 1500 m^3
each one having zeppelin A only one molecule more than zeppelin B...!
Do not we need an alien Roswell Grey technology for that? :)

Last night I found in the web the "strange word", it is not
"granularity" it is = "graininess", graininess translate to spanish
properly to "granularidad" and granularidad to english as
granularity :)

At the end of this link: http://panda.unm.edu/Courses/Finley/...hermalRad.html
there are a similar text in its original english words =

"Therefore, we see that the quantization of energy simply does not
show up for large-scale oscillators. The smallness of Planck's
constant makes the graininess in the energy much too fine to detect in
those experiments. This is quite similar to the statement that we do
not ordinarily observe the fact that the air in the room is actually
made up of many, many individual molecules. Nonetheless, we can indeed
perform experiments in which this graininess is noticeable, and even
important. Obviously the behavior of the spectral radiancy at very
short wavelengths is one such case. The phenomena involved with the
photoelectric effect, and the Compton effect, are others."

I apologize for my insistence dear Richard, I do not want to be
stubborn but I remember Carl Sagan telling: "Extraordinary claims
require extraordinary evidence" and my posting about the very large
quantum number of the 3.5 MHz Xmtrs play here the "conservative"
role :)

73 to all Miguel - LU6ETJ

PS: Szczepan: Thanks for your info.
Richard: Why a "white board"? has a special meaning? - You are
saying Cecil it is as Dr. House? - Really nice car your RX-7, I envy
you! - My London friend is "missing2 I owe you some answers :(