On Jul 9, 4:25*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 6:16 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:





Each waves are the matter waves. The speed is the particles mass
dependent.
So in the wire the sound waves travel with the low speed (medium are
ions),
and the electric waves (medium are the free electrons) with the
extremally
high speed.

The new concepts are create every day. All must be verified by
experiments.

All concepts on "inmaterial waves" was created by scientists who did not
know that in the space is matter.
Ludwig Lorenz know that because he had known what the sublimation is.
"surely you know that" also.

If you accept the matter in the space when you do not need the EM waves
and
"probabilty waves".
don't worry about mr. b... he is stuck in the 19th century.

I am in plasma physics. It is in XXI century. It is nothing wrong that I
know that Ludwig Lorenz discovered space plasma in XIX century.

some day

he may discover that some of the fun things they thought about back
then like magnetic vortices and aether were soundly debunked in the
20th century.

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
S*

well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date
and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"

well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date
and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.


Please God, let this thread die!

On 9 jul, 22:13, Allodoxaphobia
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!- Ocultar texto de la cita -

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

You have been forced to read it? Call the police ! (911)

On 7/9/2010 8:13 PM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16 pm, "Szczepan wrote:
...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan wrote:



They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.


Please God, let this thread die!

If it causes you pain I'd suggest filtering this thread out.

If you don't know how to do it I'm sure someone here would help you.
They are incredibly helpful. When they agree on something.

tom
K0TAR

On Jul 10, 3:43*am, tom wrote:
On 7/9/2010 8:13 PM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:



On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16 pm, "Szczepan *wrote:
* ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan *wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!

If it causes you pain I'd suggest filtering this thread out.

If you don't know how to do it I'm sure someone here would help you.
They are incredibly helpful. *When they agree on something.

tom
K0TAR

but when has that ever happened?

On 7/10/2010 5:28 AM, K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 10, 3:43 am, wrote:
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!

If it causes you pain I'd suggest filtering this thread out.

If you don't know how to do it I'm sure someone here would help you.
They are incredibly helpful. When they agree on something.

tom
K0TAR

but when has that ever happened?

Exactly.

tom
K0TAR

On Jul 10, 1:13*am, Allodoxaphobia
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:35:57 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 9, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 9, 4:25 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

They were debunked in XIX century.
I do not understand why you and some others use still "magnetic vortices
and
aether".
Do not you know that the Heaviside equations describe them"
well, then the heaviside equations you are looking at are out of date

and worthless... go study what is currently described as maxwell's
equations instead.

They were debunked by Royal Society. Some years after that Heaviside
reworked them. Royal Society did not accept Heaviside. Now people write what
they want. Why I should go "study what is currently described" about EM.

I prefer real physics.
S*

assuming that is the physics of your own little reality that is just
fine.

Please God, let this thread die!

NEVER!

"K1TTT" wrote
...

Please God, let this thread die!

NEVER!

I know. You appreciate my free lectures.

Now is time for the solitons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

Real waves are not simetrical. They are the chain of solitons. Radio waves
also.
S*