Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's pretty much what I've been reading on various websites.
At least some of the mystery is being cleared up ![]() is starting to look better; at least I can control the feedpoint impedance to within reason and keep a decent pattern on the bands. Pete "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... "Pete Bertini" wrote in news ![]() ... So, I would have balanced open-wire feedline from the dipole to the 4:1 balun followed by a 1:1 common-mode RF choke with I should have mentioned that 4:1 baluns integrated into ATUs are most often voltage baluns. When operated near a voltage maximum with high standing waves, they can be very lossy. Sometimes it is claimed that they 'tame' difficult antennas better than current baluns, which is often due to their internal loss. The problem as such is not the balun, it is the extreme load presented by a very poor antenna, and the lossy balun is a poor (grossly inefficient) circumvention. So, when a 4:1 voltage balun allows a match where a 1:1 current balun doesn't, the problem is probably the antenna, not the balun. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open wire feedline | Antenna | |||
OPEN WIRE LINE | Antenna | |||
Open wire feedlines | General | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment |