"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

wrote ...
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

As you know I do not understand why in XXI century most scientists use
the
hydraulic analogy.

The hydraulic analogy is use to teach basics to children.

The fluxes are for students. The divrotH = 0 also.

Gibberish.

Permittivity and polarisation are from the hydraulic analogy.

Nope, you haven't a clue what permittivity and polarization are.

Now conductivity and electrostriction should be used.

Babbling, word salad, nonsense.

Electrostriction is a new. The "" For frequencies at which dipole
orientations cannot follow the applied field "
is rather old.
Do not stay in Heaviside water.
S*

More gibberish.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Jul 30, 5:43*pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

....
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

As you know I do not understand why in XXI century most scientists use
the
hydraulic analogy.

The hydraulic analogy is use to teach basics to children.

The fluxes are for students. The divrotH = 0 also.

Gibberish.

Permittivity and polarisation are from the hydraulic analogy.

Nope, you haven't a clue what permittivity and polarization are.

Now conductivity and electrostriction should be used.

Babbling, word salad, nonsense.

Electrostriction is a new. The "" For frequencies at which dipole
orientations cannot follow the applied *field "
is rather old.
Do not stay in Heaviside water.
S*

More gibberish.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

i kind of like the idea of heaviside water... he must be carrying the
water for heaviside. i wonder if he even knows what electrostriction
really is?

K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 30, 5:43Â*pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

...
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

As you know I do not understand why in XXI century most scientists use
the
hydraulic analogy.

The hydraulic analogy is use to teach basics to children.

The fluxes are for students. The divrotH = 0 also.

Gibberish.

Permittivity and polarisation are from the hydraulic analogy.

Nope, you haven't a clue what permittivity and polarization are.

Now conductivity and electrostriction should be used.

Babbling, word salad, nonsense.

Electrostriction is a new. The "" For frequencies at which dipole
orientations cannot follow the applied Â*field "
is rather old.
Do not stay in Heaviside water.
S*

More gibberish.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

i kind of like the idea of heaviside water... he must be carrying the
water for heaviside. i wonder if he even knows what electrostriction
really is?

That babbling idiot hasn't a clue what ANYTHING really is.

If you read sci.physics.electromag you will find lots of his gibberish.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Jul 30, 5:43 pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

Electrostriction is a new. The "" For frequencies at which dipole
orientations cannot follow the applied field "
is rather old.
Do not stay in Heaviside water.
S*


i kind of like the idea of heaviside water... he must be carrying the
water for heaviside. i wonder if he even knows what electrostriction
really is?

It is not the dipole orientation (rotation). It is the deformation of the
dielectric.

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Water droplets are strongly deformed in a weak electric field.
Do not stay in the Heaviside water. There the two electric fluids were
displaced. No deformation of shape.

Now many scientists analise the electrostriction.
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Jul 30, 5:43 pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

Electrostriction is a new. The "" For frequencies at which dipole
orientations cannot follow the applied field "
is rather old.
Do not stay in Heaviside water.
S*


i kind of like the idea of heaviside water... he must be carrying the
water for heaviside. i wonder if he even knows what electrostriction
really is?

It is not the dipole orientation (rotation). It is the deformation of the
dielectric.

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Water droplets are strongly deformed in a weak electric field.
Do not stay in the Heaviside water. There the two electric fluids were
displaced. No deformation of shape.

Now many scientists analise the electrostriction.
S*

Babbling gibberish, word salad.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote ...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Babbling gibberish, word salad.

"Quartz glass has a very high dielectric strength but a very low electric
conductivity, even at high temperature, high voltage and high frequency,
nearly without electric loss in the range of the frequencies applied.
Therefore quartz glass is an excellent high temperature dielectric
material."

What is the cause: polarisation or electrostriction or the both?
S*

"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

wrote ...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Babbling gibberish, word salad.

"Quartz glass has a very high dielectric strength but a very low electric
conductivity, even at high temperature, high voltage and high frequency,
nearly without electric loss in the range of the frequencies applied.
Therefore quartz glass is an excellent high temperature dielectric
material."

Being able to cut and paste from a web page doesn't mean you are not a
babbling idiot.

What is the cause: polarisation or electrostriction or the both?
S*

Point proven.




--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Jul 31, 5:34*pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

....
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Babbling gibberish, word salad.

"Quartz glass has a very high dielectric strength but a very low electric
conductivity, even at high temperature, high voltage and high frequency,
nearly without electric loss in the range of the frequencies applied.
Therefore quartz glass is an excellent high temperature dielectric
material."

Being able to cut and paste from a web page doesn't mean you are not a
babbling idiot.

What is the cause: polarisation or electrostriction or the both?
S*

Point proven.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

I wish he would talk to art more, the two of them are more fun when
they are combining their gibberish. i guess they just don't realize
that the technobabble they have come up with doesn't really mean
anything useful, and little pieces of knowledge taken out of context
just can't be strung back together in any order to prove something
they think is right.

K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 31, 5:34Â*pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Babbling gibberish, word salad.

"Quartz glass has a very high dielectric strength but a very low electric
conductivity, even at high temperature, high voltage and high frequency,
nearly without electric loss in the range of the frequencies applied.
Therefore quartz glass is an excellent high temperature dielectric
material."

Being able to cut and paste from a web page doesn't mean you are not a
babbling idiot.

What is the cause: polarisation or electrostriction or the both?
S*

Point proven.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

I wish he would talk to art more, the two of them are more fun when
they are combining their gibberish. i guess they just don't realize
that the technobabble they have come up with doesn't really mean
anything useful, and little pieces of knowledge taken out of context
just can't be strung back together in any order to prove something
they think is right.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Jul 31, 9:14*pm, wrote:
K1TTT wrote:
On Jul 31, 5:34*pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

Babbling gibberish, word salad.

"Quartz glass has a very high dielectric strength but a very low electric
conductivity, even at high temperature, high voltage and high frequency,
nearly without electric loss in the range of the frequencies applied..
Therefore quartz glass is an excellent high temperature dielectric
material."

Being able to cut and paste from a web page doesn't mean you are not a
babbling idiot.

What is the cause: polarisation or electrostriction or the both?
S*

Point proven.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

I wish he would talk to art more, the two of them are more fun when
they are combining their gibberish. *i guess they just don't realize
that the technobabble they have come up with doesn't really mean
anything useful, and little pieces of knowledge taken out of context
just can't be strung back together in any order to prove something
they think is right.

See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

so which of these do you think may apply to Mr. B or Art? Could be
just about any of them i guess, though art seems to alternate between
Logorrhea and silence, maybe he's bipolar? Mr. B seems to be solidly
Schizophasiac, just continual nonsensical babbling.

# Wernicke's aphasia
# Schizophasia, a mental condition characterized by incoherent
babbling (compulsive or intentional, but nonsensical)
# Logorrhea (psychology), a mental condition characterized by
excessive talking (coherent or otherwise, but compulsive)