"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Jul 24, 4:30 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

In the all cases the current oscillate.
S*

i agree with tom, your brain is broken.. check it.

Yes. I mix the oscillating with pulsating: "Years later, Lodge realized that
lightning is not an oscillatory discharge but is actually a rapidly
pulsating unidirectional (dc) discharge.[2] However, the effects of the
inductive reactance on the flow of these pulsating lightning currents is the
same as Lodge predicted for oscillatory currents" From:
http://www.antiquewireless.org/otb/lodge1102.htm
S*

On Jul 25, 5:08*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Jul 24, 4:30 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



In the all cases the current oscillate.
S*
i agree with tom, your brain is broken.. check it.

Yes. I mix the oscillating with pulsating: "Years later, Lodge realized that
lightning is not an oscillatory discharge but is actually a rapidly
pulsating unidirectional (dc) discharge.[2] However, the effects of the
inductive reactance on the flow of these pulsating lightning currents is the
same as Lodge predicted for oscillatory currents" From:http://www.antiquewireless.org/otb/lodge1102.htm
S*

and i suppose you have a coherer in your receiver also?

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:56:16 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT
wrote:

and i suppose you have a coherer in your receiver also?

Is this in the same sense of coherence as to Art's babble of
equilibrium?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Uzytkownik "Richard Clark" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:56:16 -0700 (PDT), K1TTT
wrote:

and i suppose you have a coherer in your receiver also?

Is this in the same sense of coherence as to Art's babble of
equilibrium?

In Art's equilibrium and Michael's "truds" are more sense than in yours
"magnetic whirls".
All radio history apply to the longitudinal electric waves (Tesla waves) in
wires and in the space.

Lodge made the long wire antennas (see Fig 2):
http://www.antiquewireless.org/otb/lodge1102.htm

The sparks are rather harmfull for transmitting. The better is a field
emission of electrons ("truds" or the "time dependent Gauss law").

You are an expert.
Does antenna radiate if it is coated with the thick good insulation?
S*

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:26:52 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:

Does antenna radiate if it is coated with the thick good insulation?

Radiate what?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:26:52 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:

Does antenna radiate if it is coated with the thick good insulation?

Radiate what?

What is better: bare metal or insulated metal?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Richard Clark" wrote
...
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:26:52 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:

Does antenna radiate if it is coated with the thick good insulation?

Radiate what?

What is better: bare metal or insulated metal?
S*

For what?

Insulated antennas work just fine.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:26:04 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:

Radiate what?

What is better: bare metal or insulated metal?

To radiate what?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"K1TTT" wrote
...

and i suppose you have a coherer in your receiver also?

Unfortunatly the coherer do not work nowdays. To much electric waves in the
rare plasma.

But the Lodge's "electrical radiation" ("time dependent Gauss Law") works.
"Lodge then added a postscript to his own paper acknowledging Hertz's work
in an extremely positive way. He concluded the postscript by saying: "The
whole subject of electrical radiation seems working itself out splendidly".
S*