On Aug 1, 9:02*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...



On Jul 31, 5:34 pm, wrote:
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric
losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example
does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html

"Quartz glass has a very high dielectric strength but a very low
electric
conductivity, even at high temperature, high voltage and high
frequency,
nearly without electric loss in the range of the frequencies applied.
Therefore quartz glass is an excellent high temperature dielectric
material."

I wish he would talk to art more, the two of them are more fun when
they are combining their gibberish. i guess they just don't realize
that the technobabble they have come up with doesn't really mean
anything useful, and little pieces of knowledge taken out of context
just can't be strung back together in any order to prove something
they think is right.

The question was: "Does solid insulation makes the radiation weaker or stop
it?"

Instead the answer you serve me the word salad.
S*

it will not stop it, it might make it stronger or weaker depending on
the loss characteristics and what you measure as the strength.

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 1, 9:02 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric
losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example
does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html


The question was: "Does solid insulation makes the radiation weaker or
stop
it?"

it will not stop it, it might make it stronger or weaker depending on
the loss characteristics and what you measure as the strength.

And what with the "natural" insulations: the ice and the wet?

Sometimes are on your dipoles an ice or water.
They should melt/evaporate in the places where are picks of the voltage.
Is it observed?

Lodge observed the glows. So there should be the heating also.
Burn off an insulation needs more heat than melting/evaporating of
ice/water.
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 1, 9:02 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

"In fact, most dipolar solids exhibit extremely small dielectric
losses
since W tends to be extremely large. Water-free ice, for example
does not
heat significantly under microwave irradiation." From:
http://www.tan-delta.com/mw_heating.html


The question was: "Does solid insulation makes the radiation weaker or
stop
it?"

it will not stop it, it might make it stronger or weaker depending on
the loss characteristics and what you measure as the strength.

And what with the "natural" insulations: the ice and the wet?

Sometimes are on your dipoles an ice or water.
They should melt/evaporate in the places where are picks of the voltage.
Is it observed?

Lodge observed the glows. So there should be the heating also.
Burn off an insulation needs more heat than melting/evaporating of
ice/water.
S*

Yet more babbling word salad.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.