Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 5, 1:33*pm, "Al Lorona" wrote:
Anybody with experience with this antenna? It appears to be a quasi-vertical dipole with two "radials" attached to the bottom end and fed at the bottom. At least this appears to be the case; I could be wrong. What issues arise when feeding a dipole at one end (the bottom in this case)? This can't be a truly balanced design, can it? Al *W6LX I've run plenty of base fed half waves, but never saw a need for two lower elements.. You can't really call them radials in that case. They have nothing to do with lowering ground loss. But it's hard to tell, being I've never seen the antenna. But if I were base feeding a half wave, I would not bother with two lower elements spread apart. No real point in it. The main difference in feeding at the base vs feeding in the center is impedance. A much higher Z when base fed, so you need a matching device. And for that I usually prefer a single turn coil and a coax capacitor. Some have called this a "gamma loop" matching device, which is fairly close I suppose being as you tap the single turn coil at the point of best match, much like the usual gamma match. Truly balanced? Nope.. But that really doesn't mean much. Even a center fed half wave can have common mode problems. So it's not like that method of feeding cures all feed line radiation problems. They will both require decoupling sections for optimum performance. But saying that, you can often run a half wave with no real decoupling and have decent results. It will vary to each installation. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 7:38*pm, wrote:
On Aug 5, 1:33*pm, "Al Lorona" wrote: Anybody with experience with this antenna? It appears to be a quasi-vertical dipole with two "radials" attached to the bottom end and fed at the bottom. At least this appears to be the case; I could be wrong. What issues arise when feeding a dipole at one end (the bottom in this case)? This can't be a truly balanced design, can it? Al *W6LX I've run plenty of base fed half waves, but never saw a need for two lower elements.. You can't really call them radials in that case. They have nothing to do with lowering ground loss. But it's hard to tell, being I've never seen the antenna. But if I were base feeding a half wave, I would not bother with two lower elements spread apart. *No real point in it. The main difference in feeding at the base vs feeding in the center is impedance. A much higher Z when base fed, so you need a matching device. And for that I usually prefer a single turn coil and a coax capacitor. Some have called this a "gamma loop" matching device, which is fairly close I suppose being as you tap the single turn coil at the point of best match, much like the usual gamma match. *Truly balanced? *Nope.. But that really doesn't mean much. *Even a center fed half wave can have common mode problems. So it's not like that method of feeding cures all feed line radiation problems. They will both require decoupling sections for optimum performance. But saying that, you can often run a half wave with no real decoupling and have decent results. It will vary to each installation. I think there has been some efforts to improve feedline decoupling when feeding a .5wl antenna using radials. This may be such an attempt. Jimmie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|