On Aug 28, 6:15*pm, K1TTT wrote:

old hat, come on art, you can do better than try to latch onto someone
else's patent:http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5105200.html

Where is the beef? Where is the patent? What exactly do you think the
patent is claiming?
Is the claim legitimate? Has the ham community
agreed on the removal of an external magnetic field for maximum
efficiency? You have consistently denied over the years and now
miraculesly you rush to defend it. Why are you so evil? As I stated
earlier your intuitions are leading you astray in the absence of
physics teachings or classes. Go to the Physics forum and ask for the
truth.

i just want to you say more silly stuff, i need a good laugh this
weekend.

You evil evil man... chortle..
Superconductor, whooplaconductor.. My antennas already
function in the 90% plus range as far as efficiency.
If I used superconductor material for these antennas instead
of ordinary wire, would that make me a radio bully? :/
As one mentioned the other day.. It takes time to conjure up
good baffle gab, but I knew that comment would bring the baffler out
of the woodwork in short order. I was not disappointed.