LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 13th 10, 01:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default Cecil, was it you that mention a "windom balun?"

lu6etj wrote in
:

Hello boys, good day for you

Is it Carolina Windom a balanced load to justify the name "balun"? We
could think in a device to transform Z and another device to block
feed line current. What do you think about it?



Miguel,

Sometimes the language we use doesn't well describe the thing we are
thinking about, and this is a case.

We could well apply a meaning to balanced, that either the currents are
equal in magnitude but opposite in phase; or that the voltages wrt some
sensible accessible reference are equal in magnitude but opposite in
phase. One does not imply the other without constraining the load
characteristic.

When we speak of unbalanced, we commonly think of a configuration where
one side is 'grounded' and the other 'active'.

The problem is that many situations in antenna systems are not purely
either, they are not balanced by one or other of the meanings above, and
they are not unbalanced by the meaning above.

So, they need to be dealt with by the more general method of considering
that there are non-zero common mode and differential voltages and
currents.

It would be most unlikely that a Carolina Windown would be balanced, or
near to it, by any defintion. The antenna is born out of a quest to sell
the disadvantage of Windom feedline radiation as a positive feature.

The way I like to explain a balun is that it *facilitates* connection of
a not-balanced device to a balanced device. A practical balun does not,
of itself, eliminate (meaning make zero) common mode current or common
mode voltage... yet we commonly use absolute words to describe its
action.

To a certain extent, that is saying that they are not ideal or perfect
devices. Some of the rules we hams have made for baluns pretty much
assure mediocre performance. Like for example what I refer to as Rule
500, that the minimum choking impedance of a current balun is ten times
the differential characteristic impedance (commonly 50, hence Rule 500).

I know English is not your first language, but be wary of applying the
meaning of words absolutely.

Owen



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RF Systems "MLB" {Magnetic Longwire Balun} - What Is It ? RHF Shortwave 19 December 25th 06 08:19 AM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 29th 06 12:11 AM
MFJ Tuner "Current Balun" conversion. [email protected] Antenna 20 April 25th 06 11:04 PM
ABOUT - The original "WINDOM" Antenna and more . . . RHF Shortwave 0 November 18th 05 11:19 PM
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 November 4th 05 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017