Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/12/2010 7:50 PM, Owen Duffy wrote:
... Yet I have seen commercial sites selling a Guanella 4:1 current balun on a single core, arguing that Sevick said it was ok in a certain context... a context that is unlikely to ever exist in an antenna system. But hey, Sevick is Mr Baluns, so they sell. That context relates to another dimension of the balanced / symmetric issue. Back to the Carolina Windom, a common explanation holds that there is common mode current on the feedline between the dipole feedpoint and the 'isolator'. The notion that common mode current exists on one side of the isolator and not on the other is an interesting one, one better explained by advertising hyperbole than radiocommunications theory. Owen The first part, above, implies that no one has ever constructed such a balun(s), one on a single core, one on a dual core, used "balanced" resistances, to serve as loads, then unbalance the loads, and observe results. I have, when constructed properly, one can be constructed on a single core. Is the dual core better? Yes ... is it possible to run the single core balun in conditions where it will fail miserably?; Yes. Is it possible to run the dual core balun in conditions where it will fail miserably?; Yes. As to the second part, I have found a properly constructed balun to be both, a choke and "impedance-transformer." Indeed, an excellent balun is optimized to take advantage of both phenomenon. And, of course, I have found and believe a 160m to 10m balun/unun is stretching things, probably beyond what one should (but, hey, you can get by with it), two baluns, a high freq and a low freq are better to cover such a span ... however, you can carry that to an extreme and optimize core material/size and windings for each specific band ... And, radio is an onion, each layer built on a preceding layer. At the core of all this is the EM transmission theory, and RF is both particles and waves ... obviously, both have great difficulty being true at the same time, so "waves of bullets" becomes the explanation ... obviously, great difficulty is going to be had in having cement solid theory in the outer layers of this onion. By the time you get to "balance" the errors are only magnified ... balance is like any balance in life ... you'll know it when you have it, and benefit from it. Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RF Systems "MLB" {Magnetic Longwire Balun} - What Is It ? | Shortwave | |||
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? | Policy | |||
MFJ Tuner "Current Balun" conversion. | Antenna | |||
ABOUT - The original "WINDOM" Antenna and more . . . | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave |