LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 13th 10, 04:59 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Cecil, was it you that mention a "windom balun?"

On 9/12/2010 7:50 PM, Owen Duffy wrote:
... Yet I have seen commercial sites
selling a Guanella 4:1 current balun on a single core, arguing that
Sevick said it was ok in a certain context... a context that is unlikely
to ever exist in an antenna system. But hey, Sevick is Mr Baluns, so they
sell. That context relates to another dimension of the balanced /
symmetric issue.

Back to the Carolina Windom, a common explanation holds that there is
common mode current on the feedline between the dipole feedpoint and the
'isolator'. The notion that common mode current exists on one side of the
isolator and not on the other is an interesting one, one better explained
by advertising hyperbole than radiocommunications theory.

Owen


The first part, above, implies that no one has ever constructed such a
balun(s), one on a single core, one on a dual core, used "balanced"
resistances, to serve as loads, then unbalance the loads, and observe
results. I have, when constructed properly, one can be constructed on a
single core. Is the dual core better? Yes ... is it possible to run
the single core balun in conditions where it will fail miserably?; Yes.
Is it possible to run the dual core balun in conditions where it will
fail miserably?; Yes.

As to the second part, I have found a properly constructed balun to be
both, a choke and "impedance-transformer." Indeed, an excellent balun
is optimized to take advantage of both phenomenon.

And, of course, I have found and believe a 160m to 10m balun/unun is
stretching things, probably beyond what one should (but, hey, you can
get by with it), two baluns, a high freq and a low freq are better to
cover such a span ... however, you can carry that to an extreme and
optimize core material/size and windings for each specific band ...

And, radio is an onion, each layer built on a preceding layer. At the
core of all this is the EM transmission theory, and RF is both particles
and waves ... obviously, both have great difficulty being true at the
same time, so "waves of bullets" becomes the explanation ... obviously,
great difficulty is going to be had in having cement solid theory in the
outer layers of this onion. By the time you get to "balance" the errors
are only magnified ... balance is like any balance in life ... you'll
know it when you have it, and benefit from it.

Regards,
JS


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RF Systems "MLB" {Magnetic Longwire Balun} - What Is It ? RHF Shortwave 19 December 25th 06 07:19 AM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM
MFJ Tuner "Current Balun" conversion. [email protected] Antenna 20 April 25th 06 10:04 PM
ABOUT - The original "WINDOM" Antenna and more . . . RHF Shortwave 0 November 18th 05 10:19 PM
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 November 4th 05 06:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017