On Sep 15, 7:24*am, John Smith wrote:
If a mere loss of 10% drops you too close to the sensitivity threshold
of your receiver, your ability to pull out a weak signal just suffered
the kiss of death ...

John, when are you going to give up on this crystal receiver set of
yours and get a decent receiver?

http://crystalradiosupply.com/conten...%20edition.jpg

For me, receiving at anywhere near the 0.13 uV receiver threshold is
just too much work. I think they should outlaw any received signal
below 1 uV.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

On 9/15/2010 12:55 PM, Cecil Moore wrote:
On Sep 15, 7:24 am, John wrote:
If a mere loss of 10% drops you too close to the sensitivity threshold
of your receiver, your ability to pull out a weak signal just suffered
the kiss of death ...

John, when are you going to give up on this crystal receiver set of
yours and get a decent receiver?

http://crystalradiosupply.com/conten...%20edition.jpg

For me, receiving at anywhere near the 0.13 uV receiver threshold is
just too much work. I think they should outlaw any received signal
below 1 uV.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Darn Cecil, quite peeking!

From the crystal silicon in the semiconductors, to the crystaline
structure of the metals ... I just can't get away from the darn crystal
radios! And, alas, I am afraid, these days, the sensitivity of my
receivers front end far exceeds my hearing ... I was just bragging. You
caught me!

But, I can still remember those days when I could pull out a gnats
whisper above ... but then, as I remember, there was far less noise then.

Regards,
JS

On 9/15/2010 12:55 PM, Cecil Moore wrote:

...
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

quite = quit ... another bad habit in the making.

Regards,
JS