Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 1, 4:00*pm, Jim Lux wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:44:53 -0700, Jim Lux wrote: It was written by BL&E that 120 radials work, 2, 15, 30, 60, and 113. No discussion whatever of 120. I stand corrected.. thanks.. So they extrapolated to 120 as a "nice round number" for the future purposes of the FCC. The only reason the FCC used 120, is overkill for the stations to be able to avoid a costly survey. If they didn't use 120, they had to do tests to prove that the system was efficient enough. So most used 120 to avoid all that. For most cases, 120 is almost twice overkill.. For ham use 60 is usually plenty to get well into the near optimum range. Any more than that is a small increase, and usually not worth the cost of the wire. Since Owen posted this question, I did a lot more checking around, and I had already seen the MW BC examples. Seems I'm not the only one that doubts that a small number of barely elevated radials will give a large increase over ones on the ground. One that is in my camp is... Yuri will love this.. W8JI.. Tom seems to agree with my stance from what I can tell. He has done tests in this regard and his results did not show much of an increase over the ground installed radials. In fact, he gave one example where they changed a MW station from four elevated radials to the usual buried radials.. I assume 120 of them.. They then had to explain to the FCC why the buried radials suddenly gave 5 db+ gain over the supposedly "near perfect" elevated set.. :/ He also did tests on 80m comparing this same thing. The results did not pan out and pretty much were in the same ballpark as the results I saw when I tried it. IE: the elevated radials are slightly better than the same number on the ground, but only by a small amount. His tests showed that the usual buried radials using 60 or more greatly outperformed the three or four elevated radials. By 5 db+.. Myself, I think for four elevated radials to equal even sixteen on the ground would require them to be almost 1/8 wave off the ground. So it seems I'm not alone in my doubt of this supposed free lunch program. W8JI seems to be in my doubtful camp. A few others too actually. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevated Screwdriver And Radials? | Antenna | |||
Gap antennas, elevated radials | Antenna | |||
Buried Radials - a new look! | Antenna | |||
Distance between outer ends of buried radials | Antenna |