Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 1st 10, 10:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default Elevated vs buried radials

Jim Lux wrote in news:i85i4p$enq$1
@news.jpl.nasa.gov:

Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:44:53 -0700, Jim Lux
wrote:

It was written by BL&E that
120 radials work,


2, 15, 30, 60, and 113.

No discussion whatever of 120.


There might not have been much "discussion" though it is mentioned, but
the summary does contain the following:

"It is also found that a ground system consisting of 120 buried radial
wires, each on half wave long, is desirable".



I stand corrected.. thanks..
So they extrapolated to 120 as a "nice round number" for the future
purposes of the FCC.


It does appear that if someone blessed the number 120, it was probably
BL&E who did it, even if they were talking about half wave radials.

Owen

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Elevated Screwdriver And Radials? WING Antenna 7 February 12th 11 04:45 AM
Gap antennas, elevated radials Mike Speed Antenna 6 July 17th 05 05:10 AM
Buried Radials - a new look! Reg Edwards Antenna 2 August 7th 04 10:04 AM
Distance between outer ends of buried radials Steve Beyers Antenna 10 July 22nd 04 12:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017