"John Smith" wrote
...
On 10/10/2010 11:54 AM, Szczepan Bia³ek wrote:

...
We are discussing on the pulsatile flows of electrons and emission of
them
from antenna end at transmitting.
At receiving the pulsative flow is in the oppsite direction.
Do you agree?
S*

Yeah, have heard that described before ... medical marijuana has gotten a
lot more potent, huh?

What do you take that in your head is only the magnetic whirl and no place
for electrns?
S*

On Oct 11, 1:25*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"John Smith" ...

On 10/10/2010 11:54 AM, Szczepan Bia³ek wrote:

...
We are discussing on the pulsatile flows of electrons and emission of
them
from antenna end at transmitting.
At receiving the pulsative flow is in the oppsite direction.
Do you agree?
S*

Yeah, have heard that described before ... medical marijuana has gotten a
lot more potent, huh?

What do you take that in your head is only the magnetic whirl and no place
for electrns?
S*

no whirls... the mathematical operator is called curl, but it does not
relate to the often pictured whirl or vortex.

On 10/11/2010 2:47 AM, K1TTT wrote:

...
great way to loose weight!

Brother, some arse has found a way to duplicate my posts, exactly ...
even for me, that is NOT a response I would have advanced ... it is
mildly annoying, I'll give 'em that ... but hey, it happens ...

Regards,
JS

On 10/11/2010 10:25 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

...
What do you take that in your head is only the magnetic whirl and no place
for electrns?
S*

Look, the lamer which has discovered how to mimic me is having a lot of
fun ... it is kinda funny ... I will give him/her that ... marijuana and
"magnetic whirl" is/are not subjects I deal with ... you can disregard
any posts bearing my name, on this thread ...

Regards,
JS

On Oct 11, 6:37*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 10/11/2010 10:25 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

...
What do you take that in your head is only the magnetic whirl and no place
for electrns?
S*

Look, the lamer which has discovered how to mimic me is having a lot of
fun ... it is kinda funny ... I will give him/her that ... marijuana and
"magnetic whirl" is/are not subjects I deal with ... you can disregard
any posts bearing my name, on this thread ...

Regards,
JS

thats ok, we disregard anything you say anywhere.

On 10/11/2010 4:46 PM, K1TTT wrote:

...
thats ok, we disregard anything you say anywhere.

I like it when there is mutual agreement. Damn man, you aren't worth
the "paper" you write on ... I just love watching you go about it though
.... keep up the good work. wink

You are the best lesson in getting BS to float which I have ever
witnessed. Seen some good ones, but I will admit, you are top of class!

Carry on, stiff upper lip, all that ...

Regards,
JS

"K1TTT" wrote
...

no whirls... the mathematical operator is called curl, but it does not
relate to the often pictured whirl or vortex.

The math is for the geometrcal description.

In Maxwell hypothesis are the molecullar vortices. The line of force rotate.
Around the wire are the rings like the Helmholtz smoke rings. The line of
force can rotate continously or oscillate. Nothing flow along the line of
force. Maxwell did this model for the transverse waves. They are in solids
and the math is used for the torsional vibrations.

Next Heaviside did more simple math for the TEM. It is tought as EM. But I
dont understand it.
S*

On Oct 12, 4:11*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
But I dont understand it.
S*

that is the first true thing you have said... once you do come back.

K1TTT wrote:

no, the flow of electrons stays in the antenna and is sinusoidal...
they do not jump off the antenna.

Accch! Look what happens when I take a weekend off!

Okay now. I have the N3LI legal department working overtime now.

I am the person who invented the particles leaving the antenna theory.
Not Art, in fact I declare prior Art, or even prior to Art.

Ive posted it before but probably before you joined the group, so here
goes.....


The process of electromagnetic communications is all based upon tiny
little turds that reside on your antenna. Very small turds they are, yet
very powerful.

While transmitting, the little turds jump off the antenna, fly into the
atmosphere or aether, and then eventually land on a receiver's antenna,
completing the circuit.

This is why it is important to transmit every so often, so that your
antenna does not gain too much weight. During solar maximum, inactive
Hams often have their crappy antennas fall down.

Near the ocean the situation is worse, ya gotta transmit even more
often, lest ye be shoveling s**t against the tide.

And it is a well known fact that antennas that are used more for
transmitting take on a much higher polish, because there are less little
turds, and everyone knows you cant polish a.... oh never mind.

Anyhow, despite some twisted language, it is obvious that these
particles are a mer attempt to subvert the original and correct theory.


- Mike -

Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Oct 12, 4:11 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
But I dont understand it.
S*

that is the first true thing you have said... once you do come back.

I have problem with the Faraday effect:
http://www.teachspin.com/instruments...ay/index.shtml

"Although Michael Faraday discovered this effect in 1845, it wasn't modeled
quantum mechanically until the 1960's. These theoretical calculations are
too sophisticated for the undergraduate student, but an excellent simplified
QM model is carefully presented in David Van Baak's AJP paper. (D.A. Van
Baak, Resonant Faraday Rotation as a Probe of Atomic Dispersion, Am. J.
Phys.64 (6) June 1996)"

In Maxwell's model inside of the solenoid are rotating wortices and they
rotate the plane of polarization.

In Heaviside's model inside of the solenoid is a flux. Do you know
(understand) how the flux can rotate something?
S*