Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
A bit off topic, but I figure you folks are the true theorists out there, and would probably know about this. Am thinking about purchasing a shortwave defined radio receiver from WinRadio (http://www.winradio.com/home/g33ddc.htm). Here is copy from part of their spec sheet: "The receiver's robust front-end is equipped with an ultra-high-linearity amplifier which results in exceptional strong-signal performance. This already robust front-end is further enhanced with a user-selectable preselector that can operate either in a fully automatic or user-configurable mode. As many as 119 different filter combinations can be constructed by the user (91 bandpass, 14 low-pass and 14 high-pass). The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range." Was really surprised to see: The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range. I am retired now, so haven't kept up withese things, or the state of the art nowadays, but are they still using electromechanical relays for front ends feeding a 16 bit A to D ? Haven't semiconductor switches, caught up with reed relays for this application by now, or do they "still" provide a lower "on" resistance, etc. ? Any thoughts would be most appreciated. Thanks, Bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/7/2010 11:58 AM, Bob wrote:
... Any thoughts would be most appreciated. Thanks, Bob I have a lot of SW radios and amateur gear. When you have used a SDR, you are simply left with one question, "Why would anyone, anywhere, use anything different? I mean, it is still fun to fire up an old one and watch the tubes glow .... nostalgia, I guess. Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
I have a lot of SW radios and amateur gear. When you have used a SDR, you are simply left with one question, "Why would anyone, anywhere, use anything different? Propigation is always good on the internet. With a fast (15mbit download) internet connection why bother with a radio at all? To be honest, I often don't. I skype chat, I call people on a VoIP phone, I email, I use facebook, I watch TV from around the world, I listen to radio from around the world. TV and radio are especially nice because I can get the programs I want when I have time to pay attention to them. I also use my radios because I want to. I expect different things from them and chalenges to get them. To answer the original post, reed relays are relatively cheap and have very high isolation between the poles. Electronic switches are available and cheap but not with as good isolation (at least not at the price of the relays). Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM To help restaurants, as part of the "stimulus package", everyone must order dessert. As part of the socialized health plan, you are forbidden to eat it. :-) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/7/2010 11:58 AM, Bob wrote:
... Haven't semiconductor switches, caught up with reed relays for this application by now, or do they "still" provide a lower "on" resistance, etc. ? ... Thanks, Bob Forgot to respond to this part ... my whole experience with repairing electronic gear has been, first suspect a mechanical problem (switch, ground, etc.), then suspect a capacitor, then a resistor ... dead last is a semiconductor ... it is taken for granted that properly engineered equipment is the point of discussion ... Regards, JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
Was really surprised to see: The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range. I am retired now, so haven't kept up withese things, or the state of the art nowadays, but are they still using electromechanical relays for front ends feeding a 16 bit A to D ? Actually from a manufacturing point of view it sounds like they have taken the matching board from a "100 watt" automatic tuner and converted it to a preselector/filter board by chainging the programing on the controller chip. In this case the "the front end ...." stuff is marketing hype. If they got enough of them as a close out, it would be a cheaper than having to make one from scratch, no matter what was in it. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM To help restaurants, as part of the "stimulus package", everyone must order dessert. As part of the socialized health plan, you are forbidden to eat it. :-) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Haven't semiconductor switches, caught up with reed relays for this application by now, or do they "still" provide a lower "on" resistance, etc. ? Semiconductor switches have issues with intermodulation, etc. and power consumption. For wideband RF, you're not going to be using cheap 4066 CMOS muxes.. if you need to handle strong signals, that implies decent diodes with a fair amount of current. High quality sealed relays are inexpensive, very reliable, etc. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:23:15 -0700, Jim Lux wrote:
Haven't semiconductor switches, caught up with reed relays for this application by now, or do they "still" provide a lower "on" resistance, etc. ? Semiconductor switches have issues with intermodulation, etc. and power consumption. For wideband RF, you're not going to be using cheap 4066 CMOS muxes.. if you need to handle strong signals, that implies decent diodes with a fair amount of current. High quality sealed relays are inexpensive, very reliable, etc. Just a note ... The signal that will make a switching diode go nonlinear will be Strong signals (mostly AM/FM/TV) that are not even in the desired band. Several receiver manufacturers even place a 20db BCB BP filters as the first thing after the antenna connection and before the attn circuit (also diode controlled)to prevent these signals from even reaching the first BPF diode switching network. A bad thing for people interested in BCB-DX. I think relays in the front end of any RX is a good thing. Relay reliability has improved allot in the last 30 years too so longevity should not be an issue in a receiver. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:58:38 -0400, Bob wrote:
Hi, A bit off topic, but I figure you folks are the true theorists out there, and would probably know about this. Am thinking about purchasing a shortwave defined radio receiver from WinRadio (http://www.winradio.com/home/g33ddc.htm). Here is copy from part of their spec sheet: "The receiver's robust front-end is equipped with an ultra-high-linearity amplifier which results in exceptional strong-signal performance. This already robust front-end is further enhanced with a user-selectable preselector that can operate either in a fully automatic or user-configurable mode. As many as 119 different filter combinations can be constructed by the user (91 bandpass, 14 low-pass and 14 high-pass). The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range." Was really surprised to see: The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range. I am retired now, so haven't kept up withese things, or the state of the art nowadays, but are they still using electromechanical relays for front ends feeding a 16 bit A to D ? Haven't semiconductor switches, caught up with reed relays for this application by now, or do they "still" provide a lower "on" resistance, etc. ? Any thoughts would be most appreciated. Thanks, Bob Really good relays are available at very low cost today. Like less than a dollar each! Between the Low Pass filter and the inboard antenna tuner my TenTec Jupiter there are about 30 relays. Other than overrall circuit size and switching speed I see no advantage for semiconductors as compared to relays. As far as "Why Ham Radio instead of internet?" : I worked Japan last night (not my first time) on PSK-31/20 Meters with 40 watts and off the side of the Beam. The feeling was not unlike my first Ham Radio contact 50 years ago.... It is my kind of getting high! John Ferrell W8CCW |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 7, 11:58*am, Bob wrote:
Hi, A bit off topic, but I figure you folks are the true theorists out there, and would probably know about this. Am thinking about purchasing a shortwave defined radio receiver from WinRadio (http://www.winradio.com/home/g33ddc.htm). Here is copy from part of their spec sheet: * * *"The receiver's robust front-end is equipped with an ultra-high-linearity amplifier which results in exceptional strong-signal performance. This already robust front-end is further enhanced with a user-selectable preselector that can operate either in a fully automatic or user-configurable mode. As many as 119 different filter combinations can be constructed by the user (91 bandpass, 14 low-pass and 14 high-pass). The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range." Was really surprised to see: The front-end employs 34 subminiature electromechanical relays (rather than often used but distortion-prone semiconductor switches) to ensure high dynamic range. I am retired now, so haven't kept up withese things, or the state of the art nowadays, but are they still using electromechanical relays for front ends feeding a 16 bit A to D ? Haven't semiconductor switches, caught up with reed relays for this application by now, or do they "still" provide a lower "on" resistance, etc. ? Any thoughts would be most appreciated. Thanks, Bob Excuse me, Bob, but no where in the description do they mention reed relays. I really doubt they are using reed relays because of the open capacitance of the contacts, plus, reed relays often stick shut because of fatigue, static electricity, and if left closed for a long time, metal migration will stick them closed. Bet they are using regular relays, but in miniature form. Paul |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:49:12 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: I really doubt they are using reed relays because of the open capacitance of the contacts, Measuring in at 0.1pF? the 1N914 (UHF switching diode) is easily 10 times this and more. plus, reed relays often stick shut Ma Bell used them in the millions with 99.999% up-time. because of fatigue, We are talking about a switch rated in the 100 Millions to Billions of operations. static electricity, and if left closed for a long time, metal migration will stick them closed. That is true with issues compounding this, but as the receiver has its own spectral display, problems will be shown to you directly. Bet they are using regular relays, but in miniature form. Which would suffer the same issues you offer above. Reed relay usage design is not for the faint of heart, but when properly matched (an ugly word here) to the load, then they can provide service beyond your (and your children's) lifetime in this application. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sen Jack Reed smiles about Gitmo? | Shortwave | |||
reed my blog | Policy | |||
Looking for Reed, VE1NU | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: TLN8381a tone reed on 94.8 | Swap | |||
WTB: Motorola TLN8381a tone reed on 94.8 | Swap |