Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 5th 10, 02:43 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Default Distance to Fault

On 11/03/2010 03:22 AM, ashwanthh wrote:
Hi all,


For my project, I want to perform Distance to fault measurement in the
cable connecting the antenna. The principle is that a signal should be
sent to the cable and using the forward and reflected voltage VSWR
should be calculated and should be viewed in a spectrum analyzer. My
question is

1. What transducer is used to detect the transmitted/reflected signals
from the cable?

2. Should the transducer be connected in series or parallel?

Anyone, Please help



Or just use a grid dip meter.

1) Determine if the fault is a short or an open circuit with any tester.

2) Connect a small loop at the input of the cable.

3) Couple the dip meter and read the minimum frequency with a dip.

4) If a short circuit ===
Distance(meters) = 75 * cable velocity factor / frequency (MHz)

5) If an open circuit ===
Distance(meters)= 150 * cable velocity factor / frequency (MHz)
--
Alejandro Lieber LU1FCR
Rosario Argentina

Real-Time F2-Layer Critical Frequency Map foF2:
http://1fcr.com.ar
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 6th 10, 11:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 39
Default Distance to Fault

I have a similar practical real problem.

A vertical 120 ft working 75 ohm coax line hung from the top.

The soft foamed dielectric MAY be crushed under the cable's own weight
10 ft from the top end.

If it is I must change the hanging system.

ASSUMPTIONS
- the dielectric is crushed to 1/2 the original thickness over 2
inches length 10 ft from the far end
- I can put a good quality non-reflecting 75 ohm load at the far end.

QUESTION
Can I expect such a defect to generate a detectable reflection at
2GHz?


  #3   Report Post  
Old November 7th 10, 12:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 20
Default Distance to Fault

"spamhog" wrote in message
...
I have a similar practical real problem.

A vertical 120 ft working 75 ohm coax line hung from the top.

The soft foamed dielectric MAY be crushed under the cable's own weight
10 ft from the top end.

If it is I must change the hanging system.

ASSUMPTIONS
- the dielectric is crushed to 1/2 the original thickness over 2
inches length 10 ft from the far end
- I can put a good quality non-reflecting 75 ohm load at the far end.

QUESTION
Can I expect such a defect to generate a detectable reflection at
2GHz?


Yes. The cable impedance will be lowered in the vicinity of the crush.

A good time-domain reflectometer can see the impedance mismatch of
connectors - even you are using types C, N, TNC or BNC. UHF type
connectors, such as the PL-259, are readily seen. Your section of
crushed dielectric should "stick out like a sore thumb" on a TDR trace.
Termination at the far end is not necessary but it will make the
understanding of the TDR waveform easier.

Impedance mismatches, even though they are short in length, become more
important the higher in frequency as you go.

73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ


  #4   Report Post  
Old November 9th 10, 10:12 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 39
Default Distance to Fault


A good time-domain reflectometer


Thank you Barry! Would TV/FM transmitter and cell BTS installers
normally have such a device? I don't know any ham who has one but
these days I am talking to professional antenna people. And, by the
way, if one thing I am working on pans out, they'll come to install a
BTS right atop my condo. (The challenge will be to convince them to
let me hang HF wires from the same tower :-)
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 9th 10, 06:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Distance to Fault

spamhog wrote:

A good time-domain reflectometer


Thank you Barry! Would TV/FM transmitter and cell BTS installers
normally have such a device? I don't know any ham who has one but
these days I am talking to professional antenna people. And, by the
way, if one thing I am working on pans out, they'll come to install a
BTS right atop my condo. (The challenge will be to convince them to
let me hang HF wires from the same tower :-)


If you have an oscilloscope, a pulse generator and a calculator you have
a TDR.

If you don't have a pulse generator it takes about 2 IC's to build one.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bushes Fault Dan Shortwave 10 October 4th 05 01:36 AM
Help with TS711 fault Jack VK2CJC General 0 May 29th 05 10:36 AM
FT 480R fault - 147.000 MHz on TX Airy R. Bean Homebrew 9 June 28th 04 09:41 AM
RA17 Fault-Help Please AMWalmsley Shortwave 0 May 19th 04 04:14 PM
RA17-FAULT, Help please AMWalmsley Boatanchors 0 May 19th 04 04:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017