LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old November 15th 10, 02:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 74
Default Distance to Fault

On Nov 10, 7:44*pm, "Barry" wrote:
Jim,

I think you need to go back and read Spamhog's original question. *He was
trying to determine whether the center conductor of a piece of coax had
migrated away from center. *He knew where this might have happened - 10
feet from the end, and the migration would have occurred over less than
two inches. *So the question of locating where the problem might be is
moot. *What is needed is a measurement of the cable impedance in this
region.

First, let us get an estimate of what the impedance of the damaged
section might be. *Spamhog was using RG-6 cable with a foamed
polyethylene dielectric. *Its velocity factor is 0.85 making its relative
permittivity 1.384. *The center conductor is 1 mm, and the normal
diameter of the center insulator is 4.7 mm. *The thickness of the
insulator is 1.85 mm. *We need to know the impedance if the center
conductor had migrated 0.925 mm toward the jacket.

For a quick estimate, use the formula for off-center coax
(http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclo...offcenter.cfm). *This
gives an impedance of 69.8 ohms in this section compared to 78.9 ohms in
the non-distorted coax. *A TDR displays the reflection coefficient
from -1 (short) to +1 (open). *Here the reflection coefficient is -0.06..
So the TDR trace will drop from the center line by 6% for 200
picoseconds.

If your 100 MHz scope has a typical Gaussian response, its rise time is
at least 3.5 nanoseconds. *Do you really think that your oscilloscope
trace will clearly show the 200 picosecond dip? *Even with the
wide-screen magnifier that KB7QHC suggested, I think you will have great
difficulty seeing this.

* * 73, Barry *WA4VZQ


It may be that a 100 MHz scope has better than a 3.5 nsec risetime,
given that it is sped'ed for response flatness to that limit and its
response actually extends beyond !00 MHz. In retirement, I no longer
have access to test equipment that would support my point.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bushes Fault Dan Shortwave 10 October 4th 05 12:36 AM
Help with TS711 fault Jack VK2CJC General 0 May 29th 05 09:36 AM
FT 480R fault - 147.000 MHz on TX Airy R. Bean Homebrew 9 June 28th 04 08:41 AM
RA17 Fault-Help Please AMWalmsley Shortwave 0 May 19th 04 03:14 PM
RA17-FAULT, Help please AMWalmsley Boatanchors 0 May 19th 04 03:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017