Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
antenna physics question
On Nov 28, 3:32*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
I have been struggling with this for some time so maybe somebody can set me straight. We wind a flat plate spiral antenna and we get to a point where the center medium becomes saturated with flux. Now I add even more coils. What action does that precipitate? I would like to think that the Meissner effect *( perfect diamagnetism) then takes over and swamps the external magnetic field as with a superconductor ( ie opposite to that of a paramagnetic) The skin effect is thus removed allowing the current flow to the surface by allowing the atomic structure to relax, and add to the current already in place to allow fully efficient radiation as it now lies outside the confines of conductor resistance. This is my effort in determining what is it that drives the constant impedance attributes of a meander type array? Regards Art Are you questioning your effort, or all the false theories you are conjuring? For you to truly see the light, you will need to build one of those antennas, and then do A/B comparison tests against a known benchmark such as the dipole. The fact that you will never even approach the efficiency of a dipole will then dissolve all your other theories into leftover turkey casserole. We could call it "Meander Casserole" if one were desiring to patent it and publish the recipe. :/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Physics forums censor ship | Antenna | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics | CB | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |