| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JGBOYLES" wrote in message ... Hi Jerry, I need to apologize to you. I realize now that your 0.057 -j1.14 figure is a value *normalized* to 300 ohms. 17-j343 is indeed 0.057-j1.14 when normalized to 300 ohms. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Hi Jerry and Cecil, When I did my plots it was with a 50 ohm chart. I must confess I use a Smith Chart program that lets you plot any impedance on the normalized 50 ohm chart, with correct results. The program prompts when using Lines, Impedance=? Having been spoiled by the computer, I never really considered plotting transmission line Impedances on a Smith Chart that were different from the normalized Impedance. This is a neat little free demo program I use. Maybe I need to get back to basics. 73 Gary N4AST Gary Theres a very good article on use of Smith Chart for impedance matching in the July 1966 isue of Electronic Design. I like it because I wrote it. Other than that, it is of little value or interest. Jerry |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
| Pls comment on this dipole | Antenna | |||
| shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||