Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Homebrew dipole help please?
Hi
We have put together a dipole, each leg is 66 feet. We put a 1:1 balun and it is running about 60 feet of 50 ohm coax. Presently it is about half way up the tower it is intended for so we could check the SWR before getting it up to the highest point. Presently each leg has some lags and dips, no major bends but it is just hanging there, over some bushes and the entire thing is over top of the house, and not touching anything but is very close to some steel guy wires (uninsulated). Now we can only tune this down to a useable SWR on the 80m band. On all other bands we cannot tune it down to a safe operating range. We are using a good antenna tuner but cannot get anything useable except for 80m. Here we are able to tune the SWR right down. Questions??? Would we be better without that balun? Is the fact that the dipole is still too low and close to the guy wires ( but not touching) our problem? Any suggestions please?? Thank you. Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob" wrote in message ... Hi We have put together a dipole, each leg is 66 feet. We put a 1:1 balun and it is running about 60 feet of 50 ohm coax. Presently it is about half way up the tower it is intended for so we could check the SWR before getting it up to the highest point. Presently each leg has some lags and dips, no major bends but it is just hanging there, over some bushes and the entire thing is over top of the house, and not touching anything but is very close to some steel guy wires (uninsulated). Now we can only tune this down to a useable SWR on the 80m band. On all other bands we cannot tune it down to a safe operating range. We are using a good antenna tuner but cannot get anything useable except for 80m. Here we are able to tune the SWR right down. Questions??? Would we be better without that balun? If you want multi-band operation, then yes, you have to forget the balun, or put multiple dipoles on the output lugs. __ Steve KI5YG .. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Steven
Thank you for your response to my problem. Any suggestion? What you say is that I would be better off without that 1:1 balun? Yes, now I have it at 66feet each leg for a total of 132 feet but now it is not at the best height but kinda sagging and lopping where it is but off the ground and about 2 feet above the roof and other obstacles. I also have it presently close to steel guy wires and the tower itself. What would be my problem then here now? You believe it is my balun? I was hoping to get this up there and then leave it. All this climbing is difficult. Do you believe that once I get it up there, with the coax, with the dipole, no balun, do you think that would allow me better results with a good antenna tuner? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you BOb " Stephen Cowell" wrote in message m... "Bob" wrote in message ... Hi We have put together a dipole, each leg is 66 feet. We put a 1:1 balun and it is running about 60 feet of 50 ohm coax. Presently it is about half way up the tower it is intended for so we could check the SWR before getting it up to the highest point. Presently each leg has some lags and dips, no major bends but it is just hanging there, over some bushes and the entire thing is over top of the house, and not touching anything but is very close to some steel guy wires (uninsulated). Now we can only tune this down to a useable SWR on the 80m band. On all other bands we cannot tune it down to a safe operating range. We are using a good antenna tuner but cannot get anything useable except for 80m. Here we are able to tune the SWR right down. Questions??? Would we be better without that balun? If you want multi-band operation, then yes, you have to forget the balun, or put multiple dipoles on the output lugs. __ Steve KI5YG . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bob wrote:
Hi Steven Thank you for your response to my problem. Any suggestion? What you say is that I would be better off without that 1:1 balun? Yes, now I have it at 66feet each leg for a total of 132 feet but now it is not at the best height but kinda sagging and lopping where it is but off the ground and about 2 feet above the roof and other obstacles. I also have it presently close to steel guy wires and the tower itself. What would be my problem then here now? The problem is the coax. You believe it is my balun? I was hoping to get this up there and then leave it. All this climbing is difficult. Do you believe that once I get it up there, with the coax, with the dipole, no balun, do you think that would allow me better results with a good antenna tuner? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Feeding your dipole with ladder-line moves all the matching problems to the hamshack where you don't have to climb anything to solve them. Try the following configuration and get back to us on any remaining problems. XMTR--tuner--1:1 balun/choke--100 ft. 450 ohm ladder-line---132 ft. dipole This configuration will allow multi-band operation on most of the HF ham bands. The problems you will have with a couple of bands are solvable. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob" wrote in message ... Hi Steven Thank you for your response to my problem. Any suggestion? What you say is that I would be better off without that 1:1 balun? Yes, now I have it at 66feet each leg for a total of 132 feet but now it is not at the best height but kinda sagging and lopping where it is but off the ground and about 2 feet above the roof and other obstacles. I also have it presently close to steel guy wires and the tower itself. What would be my problem then here now? You believe it is my balun? The balun is basically what is limiting your multi-band operation. At crazy impedances the balun prevents the shield of the coax from assisting in absorbing some of the mismatch. Others have pointed out that the optimum situation is to feed your antenna with balanced line... if you must use coax, and you must have multi-band operation, then use an antenna tuner without a balun upstairs. RG58 doesn't work nearly as good as RG8... I couldn't make my inverted vee (resonant at 3750kHz) work 15m until I switched over to RG8. You should avoid legal-limit operation on the higher bands with this setup, unless you like burnt coax. I was hoping to get this up there and then leave it. All this climbing is difficult. Do you believe that once I get it up there, with the coax, with the dipole, no balun, do you think that would allow me better results with a good antenna tuner? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Yes, the good antenna tuner is the key. Get one with a built-in balun, so you can try balanced feedline when you get a chance. It really is hotter, both listening and transmitting. You should only climb once, put up a yardarm, rope, and pulley, and then you can play to your heart's content. Mounting a wire antenna permanently is pure hubris, beware! __ Steve KI5YG .. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bob wrote: Hi We have put together a dipole, each leg is 66 feet. We put a 1:1 balun and it is running about 60 feet of 50 ohm coax. Presently it is about half way up the tower it is intended for so we could check the SWR before getting it up to the highest point. Presently each leg has some lags and dips, no major bends but it is just hanging there, over some bushes and the entire thing is over top of the house, and not touching anything but is very close to some steel guy wires (uninsulated). Now we can only tune this down to a useable SWR on the 80m band. On all other bands we cannot tune it down to a safe operating range. We are using a good antenna tuner but cannot get anything useable except for 80m. Here we are able to tune the SWR right down. Questions??? Would we be better without that balun? Is the fact that the dipole is still too low and close to the guy wires ( but not touching) our problem? Bob, the antenna as you describe it is pretty much *for* 80 meters. If you want to tune the thing on multiple bands, and I'm assuming that you want it for the Ham frequencies, you will want to replace the coax and balun with ladder line, and use a tuner to match the impedence with your radio. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, Thank you for your response. I do not have ladder line and only have the
coax basically. Is it acceptable for good results to simply use the coax and then split it out to each direction of the copper wire? And not use the 1:1 balun? I was hoping to simply get the dipole in the air and leave it and simply tune it at the transmitter to acceptable SWR and go from there. Now I only get good SWR on the 80meters because of the length it is cut at. I was hoping also to use the dipole with the tuner on 10, 15, 20 and 40. Is this possible? The tuner is good and I know I will lose the power to the tuner but would still get to use the other bands when needed. Any more advice is greatly appreciated. thanks Bob "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bob wrote: Hi We have put together a dipole, each leg is 66 feet. We put a 1:1 balun and it is running about 60 feet of 50 ohm coax. Presently it is about half way up the tower it is intended for so we could check the SWR before getting it up to the highest point. Presently each leg has some lags and dips, no major bends but it is just hanging there, over some bushes and the entire thing is over top of the house, and not touching anything but is very close to some steel guy wires (uninsulated). Now we can only tune this down to a useable SWR on the 80m band. On all other bands we cannot tune it down to a safe operating range. We are using a good antenna tuner but cannot get anything useable except for 80m. Here we are able to tune the SWR right down. Questions??? Would we be better without that balun? Is the fact that the dipole is still too low and close to the guy wires ( but not touching) our problem? Bob, the antenna as you describe it is pretty much *for* 80 meters. If you want to tune the thing on multiple bands, and I'm assuming that you want it for the Ham frequencies, you will want to replace the coax and balun with ladder line, and use a tuner to match the impedence with your radio. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bob wrote:
Hi, Thank you for your response. I do not have ladder line and only have the coax basically. The coax *IS* the problem. If you don't like to climb, you are going to have to replace the coax with something like 450 ohm ladder-line. 100 ft. of such ladder-line costs about $17. One other possible solution is to install an autotuner at the antenna feedpoint but that is a pain to do. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Cecil Moore wrote:
Bob wrote: Hi, Thank you for your response. I do not have ladder line and only have the coax basically. The coax *IS* the problem. If you don't like to climb, you are going to have to replace the coax with something like 450 ohm ladder-line. 100 ft. of such ladder-line costs about $17. One other possible solution is to install an autotuner at the antenna feedpoint but that is a pain to do. Fer sure! I love my ladder line, and it's foibles are worth putting up with IMO. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bob wrote:
Hi, Thank you for your response. I do not have ladder line and only have the coax basically. Is it acceptable for good results to simply use the coax and then split it out to each direction of the copper wire? And not use the 1:1 balun? I was hoping to simply get the dipole in the air and leave it and simply tune it at the transmitter to acceptable SWR and go from there. Now I only get good SWR on the 80meters because of the length it is cut at. I was hoping also to use the dipole with the tuner on 10, 15, 20 and 40. Is this possible? The tuner is good and I know I will lose the power to the tuner but would still get to use the other bands when needed. Any more advice is greatly appreciated. thanks Bob The 1:1 balun isn't effecting the match on the other bands. If you remove it, there probably wouldn't be much difference at all. You could maybe put traps on the antenna so that it will be able to resonate on multiple bands. Another option would be to make multiple dipoles for the other bands. The impedance mismatch will make the signal tend to go down the dipole that corresponds to the desired band. Think of that sort of dipole as a fan so to speak. If you go this route, You'll want to trim the lowest band first, then work your way up in frequency for the other parts of the dipole. But all of these options are a good deal more work than the ladder line method. But if you won't or can't use ladder line due to your circumstances, I'd try the fan dipole. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
10m dipole and tuner | Antenna |