Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "J. C. Mc Laughlin" wrote in message .. . Dear Mikek: Thank you for your response. Knowing goals is important. A great deal could be learned by using an antenna modeling computer program such as EZNEC. Note that my estimate of the antenna's Z is calculated with one assumption (some loss in the series inductor) and that its calculations equate 55 + j0 to the impedance of the inductor, capacitor and antenna. Some of the calculations I have seen seem to assume that one has applied 55 ohms and then look backwards from the antenna. Place my estimate of 159 -j526 in parallel with -j717 and then add (the series) 3 + j310. You should fine the result to be 55.053 -j 0.0711 which is close to 55. Maximizing the sensitivity of a semiconductor diode detector is probably done empirically because of the difficulty of finding an appropriate model for the non-linear detector. Expect that the apparent answer will be amplitude dependent. Do report you findings. Regards, Mac "J. C. Mc Laughlin" Hi J. C. If your interested in the diode characterists Ben Tongue has done a lot of crystal radio work. http://www.bentongue.com/xtalset/xtalset.html Articles 6, 7, 8, 9 , 10, 15A, 16, 17A, 27 and 28 are all about detector diodes and there characteristics. Thanks, Mikek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hd Radio Sales - Did I Get The Math Right? | Shortwave | |||
Is there something wrong with my math? | Equipment | |||
Check my math please? | Antenna | |||
MFJ259/269 Math | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math | Antenna |