![]() |
A small riddle, just for fun
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci ... On Feb 19, 9:33 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: "K1TTT" napisal w ... On Feb 18, 6:20 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: " An antenna covered with ice works. But if the ice is melting and the all pores are filled with water the antenna do not work. antennas submerged in salt water work, how does that happen?? It was here about antennas made of salt water. Is it a normal practice to make an underwater antennas? yes, there are underwater antennas in use 24/7 by military submarines... so how do the electrons get through the salt water? http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm S* |
A small riddle, just for fun
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci yes, there are underwater antennas in use 24/7 by military submarines... so how do the electrons get through the salt water? http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm S* The word electron does not appear on that page. |
A small riddle, just for fun
On 2/19/2011 1:15 PM, joe wrote:
Szczepan Bialek wrote: Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci yes, there are underwater antennas in use 24/7 by military submarines... so how do the electrons get through the salt water? They don't. Radio waves travel through water the same way they travel through outer space. Albeit better through water at ultra-low frequencies. http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm S* The word electron does not appear on that page. |
A small riddle, just for fun
On 2/19/2011 11:41 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Uzytkownik napisal w wiadomosci ... On Feb 19, 9:33 am, "Szczepan wrote: snip excess yes, there are underwater antennas in use 24/7 by military submarines... so how do the electrons get through the salt water? http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm S* I don't see where you explained anything about the electrons. The article doesn't, either. I'll repeat the question in case you forgot it again. "so how do the electrons get through the salt water?" And of course then we have the problem of RF communications with people who are in caves. How do the electrons get through the dirt? Which seems to be even less likely than salt water. tom K0TAR |
A small riddle, just for fun
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:36:25 -0600, tom wrote:
How do the electrons get through the dirt? Having not read most of the nonsense that attends this kind of side thread, I will dip my oar into this anyway and ask: How do the electrons get through the air? (especially when, in their ferocious struggle, they usually light up the night with corona in the best of worst performance that rarely achieves propagation beyond an inch). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
A small riddle, just for fun
Uzytkownik "joe" napisal w wiadomosci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci yes, there are underwater antennas in use 24/7 by military submarines... so how do the electrons get through the salt water? http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm The word electron does not appear on that page. Asymmetric molecule oscillations = sound waves. Asymmetric electron oscillations = electric waves. On that page are radio waves in air and water. Free electrons are everywhere. But the freedom is material dependent. S* |
A small riddle, just for fun
"tom" napisal w wiadomosci . net... On 2/19/2011 11:41 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote: http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm I don't see where you explained anything about the electrons. The article doesn't, either. I'll repeat the question in case you forgot it again. "so how do the electrons get through the salt water?" And of course then we have the problem of RF communications with people who are in caves. How do the electrons get through the dirt? Which seems to be even less likely than salt water. In Nature are the continuous flows and the oscillatory flows. The oscillatory flow is a second name of waves. If oscillations are asymetric than net flow take place. Electrons are everywhere. Their freedom is material dependent. S* |
A small riddle, just for fun
On Feb 20, 8:59*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
"tom" napisal w wiadomoscinews:4d606204$0$87583$8046368a@newsreade r.iphouse.net... On 2/19/2011 11:41 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote: http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm I don't see where you explained anything about the electrons. *The article doesn't, either. I'll repeat the question in case you forgot it again. "so how do the electrons get through the salt water?" And of course then we have the problem of RF communications with people who are in caves. How do the electrons get through the dirt? *Which seems to be even less likely than salt water. In Nature are the continuous flows and the oscillatory flows. The oscillatory flow is a second name of waves. If oscillations are asymetric than net flow take place. Electrons are everywhere. Their freedom is material dependent. S* but then why can't i measure dc current from my antenna? and why do my oscillations look so symmetric? |
A small riddle, just for fun
"K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci ... On Feb 20, 8:59 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: In Nature are the continuous flows and the oscillatory flows. The oscillatory flow is a second name of waves. If oscillations are asymetric than net flow take place. Electrons are everywhere. Their freedom is material dependent. but then why can't i measure dc current from my antenna? and why do my oscillations look so symmetric? To measure it you must have an equipment and good will. The last is more important. Look at the original Hertz apparatus: http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~jone...ertz/S_p11.gif To have one portion of radiation it is enough to charge one half of the dipole. Charging is made with DC. After some time you can repeat it. The radiation is in form of the damped wave: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ondes_amorties.jpg In damped waves each amplitude is smaller than the previous. So in one cycle no symmetry. It is obvious. But you can try to detect it. S* |
A small riddle, just for fun
On Feb 21, 9:41*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" napisal w ... On Feb 20, 8:59 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: In Nature are the continuous flows and the oscillatory flows. The oscillatory flow is a second name of waves. If oscillations are asymetric than net flow take place. Electrons are everywhere. Their freedom is material dependent. but then why can't i measure dc current from my antenna? *and why do my oscillations look so symmetric? To measure it you must have an equipment and good will. The last is more important. Look at the original Hertz apparatus:http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~jone...res/lecture6/h... To have one portion of radiation it is enough to charge one half of the dipole. Charging is made with DC. After some time you can repeat it. The radiation is in form of *the damped wave:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ondes_amorties.jpg In damped waves each amplitude is smaller than the previous. So in one cycle no symmetry. It is obvious. But you can try to detect it. S* can't detect it here, my waves look like perfectly symmetric sine waves and i can not measure dc on antenna. how much dc should i have with 1000w at 14mhz? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com