Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Feb 4, 8:04 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

Faraday stated that must be: "that action which may be considered as
equivalent to a lateral vibration; "

The two (or more) sources give the same result like mystery TEM.

Are you better than Faraday?
S*
no, i am better than you at reading faraday.

Do you need " the action which may be considered as equivalent to a
lateral
vibration; "?
Or you are fine with TEM?
S*

i am fine with the transverse waves described by maxwell's equations
that don't require any aether.

Maxwell equations are for Heaviside aether:
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~...Heaviside.html
"I saw that it was great, greater, and greatest, with prodigious
possibilities in its power. I was determined to master the book... It took
me several years before I could understand as much as I possible could. Then
I set Maxwell aside and followed my own course. And I progressed much more
quickly.
Despite this hatred of rigour, Heaviside was able to greatly simplify
Maxwell's 20 equations in 20 variables, replacing them by four equations in
two variables. Today we call these 'Maxwell's equations' forgetting that
they are in fact 'Heaviside's equations'."

Heaviside equations have nothing common with Faraday and Maxwell.


I prefer the Faraday idea - without any aether.
S*