Uzytkownik "tom" napisal w wiadomosci
et...
On 2/8/2011 2:37 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:


Being ignorant is not so shameful as being unwilling to learn.

Yes and no. I am an ignorant but I am here to learn.

It seems to me that Faraday model fits to todays radio. Why not?
S*

You seem to be resisting learning from those who know much better than
you. I would suggest you stop resisting, start listening and begin
learning.

I hate to be pessimistic, but I doubt you will do even 1 of the 3
suggestions.

Asking questions is not resisting. Two years ago Richard C. wrote:

"Actually you have mixed up two different characteristics. Polarity
and polarization are NOT the same thing. With RF radiation, the wave
is constantly changing polarity (that is why the source of RF is
called alternating current), but within the "line of sight" of the
antenna, the polarization for a dipole is defined by its angle to the
earth as viewed by the observer.

If you see an horizontal dipole, it produces alternating polarities of
waves with horizontal polarization. If you see a vertical dipole, it
produces alternating polarities of waves with vertical polarization.

RF energy is ALWAYS changing polarity."

Can a monopole produce "polarisation"?
S*