Yes, I know this is an antenna newsgroup but the people who read this
traffic may be able to help me.

I have always used the PK-232 for RTTY and Packet and never really messed
with the putting it into the keyboard mode for CW transmission. For
grins I decided to try this morning and ran into all kinds of problems
and could use some help.

First the TS-570 was designed for the operator to use his personal keyer
with the 570's internal keyer. The internal keyer is activated by
plugging in a Stereo Phone plug. If you want to use and external keyer
(like a PK-232), you have to use a Mono (tip and Sleeve) Phone plug.

The PK-232 has a Plus (+) and Minus (-) RCA jacks on the rear. I cannot
find anything at Radio Shack that goes from two RCA's to one Mono Phone.
Really weird setup. I found a RCA to Mono Phone plug and and it causes
the 570 to send a stream of dits when plugged into the (+) output on the
PK-232. If I plug the same cable into the (-) RCA jack on the PK-232, it
causes the 570 to send a stream of dah's.

Looks like I may have to rig up some special non standard cable taking
the center of the (+) RCA plug to the Tip of the Phone Plug and the
center of the other (-) RCA jack to the sleeve of the Phone Plug and let
the grounds float.

Do I had to dummy down the TS-570 buy turning some menu functions off?

Anybody out their CW keying a TS-570 with a PK-232?

Dick, AA5VU

ps: Just made up the cable mentioned above and when I turn on the power,
the TS-570 starts sending a constant string of dit to the side tone
oscillator... like someone duck taped a Bencher.

I must be doing something pretty dumb. Page 3-6 Section 3.3.5 of the
PK-232 manual is really confusing with a totally useless Direct CW
Keying Cable diagram.

Again, anybody been able to key the TS-570D(G) using a PK-232. I need
help.

Dick, AA5VU

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:27:32 GMT, Dick, AA5VU hath writ:
Yes, I know this is an antenna newsgroup but the people who read this
traffic may be able to help me.

" I know this is an xxxx-yyy-zzz newsgroup but but the "
" people who read this traffic may be able to help me. "

The preamble of 53.7% of the off-topic crap on usenet.

Yup, there's no chance that the folks in rec.radio.amateur.equipment
would have any clue v-a-v your query.

I suppose you'll be posting your hemmroid questions here next.
After all, "...the people who read this traffic may be able to help me."

On 13 Apr 2004 22:56:04 GMT, Dev Null wrote:

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:27:32 GMT, Dick, AA5VU hath writ:
Yes, I know this is an antenna newsgroup but the people who read this
traffic may be able to help me.

" I know this is an xxxx-yyy-zzz newsgroup but but the "
" people who read this traffic may be able to help me. "

The preamble of 53.7% of the off-topic crap on usenet.

Yup, there's no chance that the folks in rec.radio.amateur.equipment
would have any clue v-a-v your query.

I suppose you'll be posting your hemmroid questions here next.
After all, "...the people who read this traffic may be able to help me."


That was helpful. Why did you bother to waste the bandwidth.

dev kmem

In article
,
"Dick, AA5VU" wrote:

I must be doing something pretty dumb

I was doing something pretty dumb and the problem is fixed.


Dick, AA5VU

In article
,
"Dick, AA5VU" wrote:

I must be doing something pretty dumb

I was doing something pretty dumb and the problem is fixed.


Dick, AA5VU