Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Richard,
I agree with you that several statements on Norbert's site will not hold when scientifically reviewed. However I think the way you respond will likely not result in better statements. As the name of the newsgroup indicates; this is a radio amateur group and Norbert site starts with "Dutch amateur radio station". This may require another approach then you should use in a professional environment. If you prefer that, Edaboard.com (just an example) is a more suitable place. Now the result is a professional reaction of Norbert: Thank you for the explanations. I have not had the intention to start a scientific discussion here on this subject. To me it is a hobby. With my homepage I just want to share some of my experience with magnetic loop antennas, just like many other radio amateurs do. And of course I am willing to reply to reactions from readers. But I will not further discuss about scientifically details. Thank you. Best Regards 73, Norbert PA7NR Because of rain, I had to stop some activity so I took a pocket calculator, some of my own course material and a used envelope within reach. A loop with diameter = 1.27m (4m perimeter), made from 20mm (diameter) copper has an inductance of about 3.4 uH (reactance of about 77 Ohm at 3.6 MHz). Radiation resistance (no coupling with other objects) will be about 1 mOhm. AC copper resistance due to skin effect will be about 30 mOhm (based on uniform current distribution over the circumference of the tubing). Q factor should be in the range of 2500 Radiation efficiency will be about 3% Directivity is 1.5 Voltage between ends (100W input): 6.3 kVp. Current through loop about 82 Ap A half wave dipole will have about 1kVp at each end (depends on conductor thickness). Effective area of antenna will be about 23 sqm (in free space). 1Vrms incident plane wave field (2.65mW/sqm) will result in about 61mW output power (about 150Vp across the tuning capacitor). You probably know that measuring a lower Q factor may result in less overall efficiency (coupling to dissipative objects) or higher overall efficiency (coupling to metallic conductors that reradiate). With kind regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me very likely |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SBS-1 - information. Does anyone have any experience with ? | Scanner | |||
Material of wi does it affect a loop antenna's performance? | Antenna | |||
Magnetic Loop !!! | Antenna | |||
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna |