LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old April 17th 04, 12:46 AM
JGBOYLES
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The antenna described in this thread has been utilized by the military
for simple, easy to erect and fairly inexpensive field use.


Yes that is very true. However, what the military needs, and what us hams are
trying to do is not that similar. What I would like as a ham is 100% of my rf
radiated, especially when I am mobile. The military wants to communicate, and
they don't care how the efficiency of the antenna system factors in to all
this.
In an old textbook of mine, the military wanted an automatic antenna tuner
that would match 20KW to a 35' whip 2-30 MHZ. At 2MHZ the whip was very
inefficient, and probably glowed in the dark. But they could communicate by
the brute force method. I guess it depends on whether your goal is just to
communicate, or communicate the most efficient way.
73 Gary N4AST
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017