Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 mar, 23:55, Richard Fry wrote:
A few years ago there was some discussion on r.r.a.a. about helically- wound, normal-mode monopoles, and the rather common expectation that they had higher gain than a linear monopole of the same physical height (and with other things equal). A recent NEC-2 analysis of this topic might be of interest:http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8..._Linear_Monopo... . Also this link to a page from John Kraus' ANTENNAS FOR ALL APPLICATIONS, 3rd Edition:http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...y-woundVertica... . // Hello Richard, Maybe there is confusion between gain and directivity. When there is no change in the phase of the current, and overall physical length 0.25 lambda, directivity will be 1.76 dBi (or 4.76 dB over perfect electrical conducting ground). I can imagine that part of the matching can be in the helix (lots of copper) so that the ohmic loss may be less w.r.t. to a lumped coil at the feed point. If so, the gain of the helix can be higher. If you can make the helix electrically longer then 0.25 lambda (so that current maximum is not in the feed point, but for example in the middle), directivity will not change, but ground loss will reduce as the helix will have high Re(Zin). Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fractal Sleeve for Monopoles? | Antenna | |||
Magnetic monopoles | Antenna | |||
Helically-wound Monopoles | Antenna | |||
Vertical dipole, helically wound - comments? | Antenna | |||
End Effect on folded dipoles/monopoles? | Antenna |