Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 5:35*pm, "Richard Fry" wrote:
But if, as if you posted earlier, "a helical monopole is 90 degrees long at the design frequency," are you claiming that such a short, self-resonant, normal-mode, helical monopole has the same radiation resistance and system performance as a self-resonant linear monopole of about 1/4 of a free-space wavelength (other things equal)? Absolutely not. I am claiming that a 1/8WL long *resonant* helical is electrically 90 degrees long and has approximately the same radiation resistance as a 1/8WL straight piece of wire. Radiation resistance and linear *physical* length are correlated. Radiation resistance and *electrical* length are NOT correlated. As I said previously (concerning standing wave antennas) the feedpoint impedance is associated with the electrical length of the antenna. Radiation is associated with the physical length of the antenna. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fractal Sleeve for Monopoles? | Antenna | |||
Magnetic monopoles | Antenna | |||
Helically-wound Monopoles | Antenna | |||
Vertical dipole, helically wound - comments? | Antenna | |||
End Effect on folded dipoles/monopoles? | Antenna |