Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wimpie wrote:
Hello Cecil, On 27 abr, 20:13, Cecil Moore wrote: On Apr 27, 10:30 am, Wimpie wrote: Depending on the frequency resolution of your VSA, the frequency of the injected signal can be well within 1 kHz of the carrier, so LC filters in the PA will not distort the measurement. In case of a 100W PA and injection of about 100 mW, the difference in wanted signal and signal to be rejected is 30 dB (not that large). Would any competent optical physicist suggest that it is valid to study the conditions associated with interfering coherent light waves inside an interferometer by introducing an incoherent light source into the system? Why would any competent RF engineer suggest that the system source conditions associated with interfering coherent RF waves can be studied by introducing an incoherent test signal? As this slightly off-carrier frequency signal behaves like a load with very low VSWR with a cable in between that extends with constant speed. In other words, the amplifier sees a constant VSWR, but with changing phase. Small frequency difference results in slow phase change of VSWR. to the device under test, this isn't much different than a electrically controlled line stretcher (a classic automated load pull setup... see the stuff from Maury Microwave, for instance) It's a very clever technique. A variant is used in antenna ranges where you have a probe with a mismatch in it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
Measuring RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
Tuna Tin (II) output impedance | Homebrew | |||
Tuna Tin (II) output impedance | Homebrew | |||
74HC series RF output impedance | Homebrew |