Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 abr, 14:39, Cecil Moore wrote:
On Apr 27, 6:33*pm, Wimpie wrote: With respect to the impedance concept, we as amateurs do not use steady state signals, as they contain no information. We modulate them and are still using the impedance concept, despite the definitiones you showed. Trouble is, the impedance in IEEE definition (1)(B) doesn't *cause* reflections. If the actual source impedance matches IEEE definition (1) (B), the presumption that source impedance will *cause* a reflection is invalid. Are you familiar with the concept of S-parameters where you determine impedance by measuring of reflection coefficient? Walter Maxwell argues that the actual source impedance of an RF amplifier is in reality a V/I ratio, i.e. it agrees with IEEE definition (1)(B). -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com "Halitosis is better than no breath at all.", Don, KE6AJH/SK Wim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
Measuring RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
Tuna Tin (II) output impedance | Homebrew | |||
Tuna Tin (II) output impedance | Homebrew | |||
74HC series RF output impedance | Homebrew |