Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The stray capacitances to the rest of the world will be of the same order as
the required value of capacitance. The presence of stray capacitances, not being accounted for in the design, will cause whatever it is to behave in an unpredictable manner. You may be right Reg, however the capacitive loading I need is not distributed throughout the length on the antenna. Seems the stray capacitance would be distributed. In particular I need -j2500 ohms at a specific point on the antenna. What I am attempting is to change the current distribution on an Extended Double Zepp (1.25 lambda dipole) such that the gain and F/B ratio are more to my liking. There is a published article on doing just this on a 40M EDZ. -2500 ohms at 7.2 mhz is 9pf. I just scaled it up to 147mhz to .4pf. I have tried different values of loading, and different positions on the antenna, but this seems optimum. What I have now is a 3 element beam with 17dbi forward gain with 12 db F/B ratio, at least on paper. Methinks you should re-engineer whatever it is to something which requires a capacitance of something greater than 0.4 pF and is of a more realiseable and predictable value. Maybe back to the drawing board? Decrease loading and change position. What size cap. would be resonable? 73 Gary N4AST |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Top Loading Butternut HF2V for 160m | Antenna | |||
Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Loading Coils & Numbers | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |